2021
DOI: 10.1109/taslp.2020.3037532
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Passive Geometry Calibration for Microphone Arrays Based on Distributed Damped Newton Optimization

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Analyzing the numerical results from Table 1 , it can be observed that approaches such as in [ 28 ] do not take into account the compensation for the onset time, and do not achieve reasonably low position and orientation errors, regardless of the room reverberation time level. In the case of the moderate reverberation time ( [ms]), the other two methods [ 20 , 31 ] and the approach proposed in this article achieve very comparable results. In the case of a long reverberation time, the methods presented in [ 20 , 31 ] again perform comparably, while the algorithm proposed in this article achieves significantly better results for all evaluation metrics.…”
Section: Experimental Evaluationmentioning
confidence: 93%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Analyzing the numerical results from Table 1 , it can be observed that approaches such as in [ 28 ] do not take into account the compensation for the onset time, and do not achieve reasonably low position and orientation errors, regardless of the room reverberation time level. In the case of the moderate reverberation time ( [ms]), the other two methods [ 20 , 31 ] and the approach proposed in this article achieve very comparable results. In the case of a long reverberation time, the methods presented in [ 20 , 31 ] again perform comparably, while the algorithm proposed in this article achieves significantly better results for all evaluation metrics.…”
Section: Experimental Evaluationmentioning
confidence: 93%
“…To fully evaluate the performance of the proposed approach in practical deployments, we present the results of two additional experiments that do not take into account this mitigation, in which reverberant microphone signals are used for DoA estimation too. In the following two experiments, we compare the proposed method with several well-established state-of-the-art approaches [ 20 , 28 , 31 ]. To this end, we introduce three additional evaluation metrics that show the average displacement of the estimated positions from the ground-truth values.…”
Section: Experimental Evaluationmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…where l 0 is the frame shift of the correlation in (12), the SRO ε im between nodes i and m can either be estimated by the ACD approach [24] with…”
Section: Existing Sampling Rate Calibration Approachesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, as sampling time increases, the natural phase relationships among node output signals are destroyed severely, which in turn affects the spatial information acquisition by using microphone networks. Consequently, this will significantly degrade the performance of many audio processing tasks [12]- [16]. Therefore, sampling rate synchronization is crucial for distributed acoustic sensor networks.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%