Collective motion is observed in swarms of swimmers of various sizes, ranging from self-propelled nanoparticles to fish. The mechanisms that govern interactions among individuals are debated, and vary from one species to another. Although the interactions among relatively large animals, such as fish, are controlled by their nervous systems, the interactions among microorganisms, which lack nervous systems, are controlled through physical and chemical pathways. Little is known, however, regarding the mechanism of collective movements in microscopic organisms with nervous systems. To attempt to remedy this, we studied collective swimming behavior in the nematode Caenorhabditis elegans, a microorganism with a compact nervous system. We evaluated the contributions of hydrodynamic forces, contact forces, and mechanosensory input to the interactions among individuals. We devised an experiment to examine pair interactions as a function of the distance between the animals and observed that gait synchronization occurred only when the animals were in close proximity, independent of genes required for mechanosensation. Our measurements and simulations indicate that steric hindrance is the dominant factor responsible for motion synchronization in C. elegans, and that hydrodynamic interactions and genotype do not play a significant role. We infer that a similar mechanism may apply to other microscopic swimming organisms and self-propelled particles.C ollective motion of multiple individuals has been observed in swarms of large and small organisms, in single cells, and in suspensions of self-propelling objects (1). The mechanisms of interactions among individuals leading to collective motion vary among organisms. Large organisms such as fish likely use their nervous system to coordinate their motions (2). At the micrometer scale, swarms of organisms lacking nervous systems exhibit gait synchronization (3) and pattern formation (4-17). Long-range hydrodynamic interactions (18-30) and short-range nonhydrodynamic interactions (17, 31, 32) have been implicated in enabling coordination among swimmers. However, the relative importance of hydrodynamic interactions and nonhydrodynamic interactions remains an open question (32-34).In comparison with swimming fish at one extreme and singlecelled organisms on the other, both of which have been studied extensively, little is known about the interactions among animals, such as the nematode Caenorhabditis elegans, that are too small for inertia to play a significant role (that is, they are low Reynolds number swimmers; ref. 35), large enough for Brownian motion to be irrelevant, and possess a nervous system. Although the ecological niches of C. elegans are not yet precisely known (36), in the laboratory C. elegans often exist in dense populations with ample opportunity for interactions among animals. The fact that most wild-type C. elegans feed in swarms (37) suggests that interactions among individuals are common in nature. However, there are only a very few studies of interaction among i...