ABSTRACT. There is need to identify and quantify the contribution of different sources to airborne particulate matter (PM) arge amounts of particulate matter (PM) are emitted from animal houses, which can compromise animal and human respiratory health (Radon et al., 2001;Zuskin et al., 1995) and the environment as well. The scientific community and stakeholders (farmers and local authorities) are seeking technically feasible and economically viable solutions to reduce these emissions to comply with air quality regulations. Preventing dust release from its source not only reduces emissions from the animal house but improves the indoor climate as well. To develop such reduction techniques, it is necessary to identify and quantify the sources that contribute to PM in animal houses.A complete assessment can be achieved by quantifying PM contributions from each source according to particle numbers and mass. Knowledge of the relationship between particle number and mass contributions is essential because it gives an insight into particle size and morphology related to different particle types (sources). Moreover, particle size and morphology are related to a particle's aerodynamic behavior, which is closely related to lung deposition mechanisms in the human airways: inertial impaction, sedimentation, interception, and diffusion (Zhang, 2004). Although current European and U.S. regulations set limits to PM concentrations based on mass, a mass-only approach to reduce PM would have very little effect on the number concentrations of smaller particles found in the fine fraction. This fraction contains fine and ultra-fine particles that pose greater risks of adverse health effects because these particles can go beyond the larynx and penetrate into the unciliated respiratory system (CEN, 1993). The control of particles larger than 2.5 mm in diameter, however, is also relevant, because these particles can also cause adverse health effects through deposition in the upper respiratory airways. Furthermore, particles larger than 2 mm in diameter found in animal houses have been shown to contain high amounts of odorants (Cai et al., 2006) and micro-organisms (Lee et al., 2006). Consequently, both PM number and mass concentrations should be measured to tackle PM pollution related issues within animal houses, to develop reduction techniques, and to assess their effects.Analytical methods used to characterize PM, such as microscopic analysis, can supply useful but limited data on particle or source chemical composition and morphological characteristics. To further identify and quantify source contributions, source apportionment models can be used. These models are versatile because they can be used in different scenarios (Watson et al., 2002). L