Actinides accumulate within aquatic biota in concentrations
several
orders of magnitude higher than in the seawater [the concentration
factor (CF)], presenting an elevated radiological and biotoxicological
risk to human consumers. CFs currently vary widely for the same radionuclide
and species, which limits the accuracy of the modeled radiation dose
to the public through seafood consumption. We propose that CFs will
show less dispersion if calculated using a time-integrated measure
of the labile (bioavailable) fraction instead of a specific spot sample
of bulk water. Herein, we assess recently developed configurations
of the diffusive gradients in thin films (DGT) sampling technique
to provide a more accurate predictor for the bioaccumulation of uranium,
plutonium, and americium within the biota of the Sellafield-impacted
Esk Estuary (UK). We complement DGT data with the cross-flow ultrafiltration
of bulk seawater to assess the DGT-labile fraction versus the bulk
concentration. Sequential elution of
Fucus vesiculosis
reveals preferential internalization and strong intracellular binding
of less particle-reactive uranium. We find significant variations
between CF values in biota calculated using a spot sample versus using
DGT, which suggest an underestimation of the CF by spot sampling in
some cases. We therefore recommend a revision of CF values using time-integrated
bioavailability proxies.