1994
DOI: 10.1109/9.286266
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Passivity-based adaptive attitude control of a rigid spacecraft

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
148
0

Year Published

1997
1997
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 247 publications
(148 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
0
148
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The corresponding velocity error in body-coordinates is e;L , ? r : (6.4) This is a common choice, see for example (Egeland and Godhavn 1994), however it comes with some constraints on the design of , as we show below. Other choices of transport map are possible.…”
Section: Error Functions and Transport Mapsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The corresponding velocity error in body-coordinates is e;L , ? r : (6.4) This is a common choice, see for example (Egeland and Godhavn 1994), however it comes with some constraints on the design of , as we show below. Other choices of transport map are possible.…”
Section: Error Functions and Transport Mapsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…6,10,12,31 We treat the PD law here for comparison to the new control laws developed in the next two sections. There are also some novel aspects to our stability proof.…”
Section: Pd Control Of the Nonlinear Systemmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The resulting closed-loop dynamics are either partially or completely linearized, in the absence of control saturation and modeling error. The second feedback 6,11,12 is a linear PD law; the gyroscopic torque is not canceled. From an energy perspective, it is clear that the gyroscopic torque is a neutral party in the stabilization task and in this regard does not need to be canceled.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The controller is a certaintyequivalence version of the standard passivity-based adaptive attitude regulator of [10], where state-feedback is replaced by feedback from the estimated angular velocity, and a robust redesign of the update law is employed. While it is customary to retain the original coordinates of the plant for stability analysis, for the problem at issue it is more advantageous to perform the analysis entirely in the observer coordinate system, and regard the observation error as a converging disturbance.…”
Section: Tracking Controllermentioning
confidence: 99%