2008
DOI: 10.1049/iet-epa:20070317
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Passivity-based control of linear switched reluctance motors with robustness consideration

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Realizing high-performance dynamic control of motors under multifactor constraints has been widely investigated to overcome complex factors, such as strong coupling, nonlinear, and multitime variation [8][9][10][11][12][13][14][15][16][17][18][19][20] integral-derivative (PID) controllers occupy a dominant position in the existing industrial control field because its structure is simple and easy to implement. Maslan et al [8] applied a PID controller to an LSRM by combining three different heuristic optimization techniques namely, PIDparticle swarm optimization (PSO), fuzzy PSO, and genetic algorithm (GA)-PSO.…”
Section: State Of the Artmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Realizing high-performance dynamic control of motors under multifactor constraints has been widely investigated to overcome complex factors, such as strong coupling, nonlinear, and multitime variation [8][9][10][11][12][13][14][15][16][17][18][19][20] integral-derivative (PID) controllers occupy a dominant position in the existing industrial control field because its structure is simple and easy to implement. Maslan et al [8] applied a PID controller to an LSRM by combining three different heuristic optimization techniques namely, PIDparticle swarm optimization (PSO), fuzzy PSO, and genetic algorithm (GA)-PSO.…”
Section: State Of the Artmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The control performance is poor when the rules are excessively few, whereas the performance requires a long time period when the rules are excessive. Modern control methods, such as adaptive, sliding mode, backstepping, and passive control, have been applied to the position tracking control of motors [11][12][13][14][15][16][17][18][19]. Ammar et al [11] adopted an adaptive control strategy, namely, model reference adaptive controller (MRAC) to adjust the torque and stator flux of asynchronous motors to ensure robust control and small sensitivity of machine parameters compared with traditional PI controllers.…”
Section: State Of the Artmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…A self-tuning regulator is also developed to combat uncertain control behavior of this motor. Introducing a full-order nonlinear controlled model, the robust passivity-based control is proposed in [12] for the position tracking system of the LSRM. To reduce propulsion force pulsations in the LSRM which is essential for elevators, the controlled multiphase excitation using the force distribution functions (FDF) is considered in [13].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is very difficult for a traditional proportional-integral-differential (PID) controller to cope with such disturbances since its design is mainly based on the static model of a system [15]. To achieve a high-precision position control performance, the dynamic models for the primary and secondary parts should be established for uniform operations [16][17]. According to current literature, a nonlinear proportional differential (PD) controller is introduced for the LSRM to achieve a better dynamic response; in [17], a passivity-based control algorithm is proposed for a position tracking system of the LSRM to overcome the inherent nonlinear characteristics and render system robustness against uncertainties.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%