Ice in the Climate System 1993
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-642-85016-5_29
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Past Accumulation rates derived from observed annual layers in the GRIP ice core from Summit, Central Greenland

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

7
67
0

Year Published

1998
1998
2014
2014

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 104 publications
(74 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
7
67
0
Order By: Relevance
“…yr −1 to 0.11 m w.e. yr −1 , in agreement with accumulation rates derived from the GRIP ice core (Dahl-Jensen et al, 1993). On the other hand, margin SMB increases from −2 m w.e.…”
Section: Evolution Of Surface Forcing Conditionssupporting
confidence: 87%
“…yr −1 to 0.11 m w.e. yr −1 , in agreement with accumulation rates derived from the GRIP ice core (Dahl-Jensen et al, 1993). On the other hand, margin SMB increases from −2 m w.e.…”
Section: Evolution Of Surface Forcing Conditionssupporting
confidence: 87%
“…18 O values found in the Greenland records for the last glacial period [29] (though not for the Holocene [30]) and inferred for most other Antarctic ice cores. It is expected that at near-coastal sites like Taylor Dome and Law Dome, snowfall may be dependent on non-temperature linked effects like the moist -air cyclonic activity or sea ice conditions [12].…”
Section: Ice Timescale and Accumulation Rate Calculationsmentioning
confidence: 63%
“…Recent glaciological evidence [28,29] suggests that the LGM surface topography used in the PMIP simulations [30] is much too high over Central Greenland, the real LGM surface altitude having probably been close to the present-day value, both at Summit and at Vostok. Thus, the simulated LGM surface air temperature has been interpolated from the LGM model surface altitude to present-day altitude, using y = DT s /Dh = 10 ‡C/1000 m. This value, typical for the interior of Greenland and Antarctica [31], is not an atmospheric lapse rate, but the dependency of surface air temperature T s on surface altitude h. The simulated (altitude-corrected) climate change v c T s = vT s +yvh from the LGM to present (Table 3) is generally not as strong as ice core data indicate [32,33].…”
Section: Simulated Lgm Climatementioning
confidence: 98%