2016
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pntd.0005247
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Past and Ongoing Tsetse and Animal Trypanosomiasis Control Operations in Five African Countries: A Systematic Review

Abstract: BackgroundControl operations targeting Animal African Trypanosomiasis and its primary vector, the tsetse, were covering approximately 128,000 km2 of Africa in 2001, which is a mere 1.3% of the tsetse infested area. Although extensive trypanosomiasis and tsetse (T&T) control operations have been running since the beginning of the 20th century, Animal African Trypanosomiasis is still a major constraint of livestock production in sub-Saharan Africa.Methodology/Principal FindingsWe performed a systematic review of… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
86
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
3
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 82 publications
(87 citation statements)
references
References 101 publications
1
86
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Our results indicate that, the tsetse populations on Big Chamaunga and Manga islands have recovered from the previously reported apparent densities of less than 0.1 and 1 fly/trap/ day after their suppression during trials using tiny targets to control G. f. fuscipes (2011 -2012 and 2012 -2013 respectively) (Tirados et al, 2015) to 9.2 and 22.7 flies/trap/day respectively. Recovery could be due to suppressed population growing back to presuppression levels or re-invasion from neighbouring areas (Meyer et al, 2016). The significantly smaller size of both females and males collected three years after tsetse control intervention on Big Chamaunga suggests that recovery in this case could have been mainly due to the suppressed population growing back.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 88%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Our results indicate that, the tsetse populations on Big Chamaunga and Manga islands have recovered from the previously reported apparent densities of less than 0.1 and 1 fly/trap/ day after their suppression during trials using tiny targets to control G. f. fuscipes (2011 -2012 and 2012 -2013 respectively) (Tirados et al, 2015) to 9.2 and 22.7 flies/trap/day respectively. Recovery could be due to suppressed population growing back to presuppression levels or re-invasion from neighbouring areas (Meyer et al, 2016). The significantly smaller size of both females and males collected three years after tsetse control intervention on Big Chamaunga suggests that recovery in this case could have been mainly due to the suppressed population growing back.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 88%
“…This could have led to the observed smaller size in tsetse that recovered and were caught on Big Chamaunga compared to Small Chamaunga and the other island. Apart from density dependant factors, the lower mobility and displacement rate of smaller flies (Vale et al, 2014(Vale et al, , 1984 and their reduced chance of encountering targets (thereby increasing their chance of survival) could be among the factors that explain why the use of targets alone as a tsetse control method has rare reports of successful elimination of tsetse populations (Meyer et al, 2016;Vreysen et al, 2013). Probably the use of targets only could achieve more successes in elimination by incorporating strategies in the tsetse control approach that also aim at killing the smaller flies that do not encounter targets.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…By affecting livestock, tsetse is generating a livestock health crisis that has cumulative effects on socioeconomic and cultural well-being. In a review of five African countries, Meyer et al observed that tsetse affected farmers' livelihoods and welfare and food security and posed a threat to public health [69]. As indicated by participants in the assessments, livestock deaths caused by livestock nagana have become widespread, particularly in the Kaabong and Kotido districts.…”
Section: Tsetse Prevalence and Distribution Patternsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Mitigation risk of exposure goes through avoiding grazing in infested areas and use of prophylactic trypanocides. Trypanotolerant breeds and crossbreds are also recommended [54] but not appreciated by farmers because of their low production rate.…”
Section: Suggesting Approach To Control Emerging Vector-borne Diseasesmentioning
confidence: 99%