2019
DOI: 10.1016/bs.plm.2019.03.006
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Past experience and meaning affect object detection: A hierarchical Bayesian approach

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
23
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(23 citation statements)
references
References 69 publications
0
23
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Consequently, the explanation in terms of the integration of object memory and current stimulation better fits the data than an explanation in terms of attention. Previous studies have shown that borders of stimuli such as those tested here can access memory representations of familiar objects very early in processing and serve as priors for figural assignment 4,5,36,[38][39][40][41][42] . The present experiments show that the influence of past experiences transcends the effect seen on figural assignment and extends to the subjective appearance of stimuli.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Consequently, the explanation in terms of the integration of object memory and current stimulation better fits the data than an explanation in terms of attention. Previous studies have shown that borders of stimuli such as those tested here can access memory representations of familiar objects very early in processing and serve as priors for figural assignment 4,5,36,[38][39][40][41][42] . The present experiments show that the influence of past experiences transcends the effect seen on figural assignment and extends to the subjective appearance of stimuli.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The familiar stimulus was the Test on half the trials; the novel stimulus was the Test on the other half the trials. There were 16 trials for each combination of stimulus condition (familiar vs novel Test stimulus), priming condition (identity, unrelated, control), and Test stimulus blur level (3)(4)(5)(6)(7)(8)(9)(10)(11). All trial types were randomly intermixed.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Consequently, the explanation in terms of the integration of object memory and current stimulation better fits the data than an explanation in terms of attention. Previous studies have shown that borders of stimuli such as those tested here can access memory representations of familiar objects very early in processing and serve as priors for figural assignment 45, 33, 3539 . The present experiments show that the influence of past experiences transcends the effect seen on figural assignment and extends to the subjective appearance of stimuli.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 89%
“…Studies of vision demonstrate that bottom-up processes are not sufficient for understanding how the brain constructs our percept of the external world; instead, they reveal that higher factors such as attention, expectation, and memory also influence visual processing 1–5 . While attention facilitates processing of visual stimuli by granting priority to the more relevant aspects of the scene, memory and expectation do so by constraining possible interpretations of visual input and predicting what is likely to occur in the sensory environment based on prior experience; all result in improved perceptual performance 3,68 .…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%