2020
DOI: 10.4322/pmd.2019.028
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Past, present, and future of Product Management and Development: a bibliometric study on the contribution and challenges of PMD journal

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In line with Morais et al (2020), it is worth noting that the PMD -Product Management & Development review and community has a long tradition of investigating, proposing, and applying MaTs in innovative contexts. A nonexhaustive list includes Cheng (2002) with a Quality Function Deployment (QFD) implementation guide; Benedictis et al (2004), who studied MaTs for modeling the product development process; Oliveira et al (2009), with an application of Roadmapping in startups; Carvalho & Mello (2011) that investigated Scrum for product development; and Cunha et al (2013) offering a case of information management MaTs supporting the product development process.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 80%
“…In line with Morais et al (2020), it is worth noting that the PMD -Product Management & Development review and community has a long tradition of investigating, proposing, and applying MaTs in innovative contexts. A nonexhaustive list includes Cheng (2002) with a Quality Function Deployment (QFD) implementation guide; Benedictis et al (2004), who studied MaTs for modeling the product development process; Oliveira et al (2009), with an application of Roadmapping in startups; Carvalho & Mello (2011) that investigated Scrum for product development; and Cunha et al (2013) offering a case of information management MaTs supporting the product development process.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 80%
“…As a consequence, there is a lack of specific methods to support entrepreneurial efforts in science-technologyintensive fields, which typically occur in academic settings and are strongly challenged by high levels of both technical and market uncertainty, long creation and development cycles, and unprecedented potential of disruptions (Ndonzuau et al, 2002;Shane, 2004). Moreover, entrepreneurial and corporate models of innovation, after evolving as separate debates for a long time, are increasingly being faced by the challenges of the current context of dynamic innovation ecosystems which claim for new integrated approaches (Freeman & Engel, 2007;Gusberti et al, 2010;Morais et al, 2020;Ries, 2017;Souza et al, 2020).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%