2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.obhdp.2016.05.007
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Past, present, and potential future of team diversity research: From compositional diversity to emergent diversity

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

7
201
0
6

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 211 publications
(214 citation statements)
references
References 96 publications
7
201
0
6
Order By: Relevance
“…In comparison to previous studies [36], this study contributes to developing a model in which a moderator (temporal team leadership) was inculcated, in order to enhance the literature on team composition.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In comparison to previous studies [36], this study contributes to developing a model in which a moderator (temporal team leadership) was inculcated, in order to enhance the literature on team composition.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…When the team consists of temporal diversity like time urgency, pacing style, and time perspective diversity then relevant problems and conflicts arise due to the differences in employees or team members. Every individual has some distinct characteristics, and when such people interact with each other in sharing knowledge then many responses occur, which can be in the form of conflicts, if considered in a pessimistic way; if considered an optimistic way, knowledge sharing synergizes the heterogeneity of the team into better performance and creativity [36]. Having a positive role in the knowledge sharing process can increase innovative behaviors [37].…”
Section: The Mediating Effects Of Temporal Conflicts Between Temporalmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Metatheorizing involves a systematic and rigorous examination of existing theories for one or more of three general goals: to deepen and enhance understanding of existing theory; to synthesize existing theories into a new theory; or to generate a transcendent perspective about the social and/or natural world (Frauley, 2017;Turner, 1990;Wallis, 2010). Metatheorizing involves a systematic and rigorous examination of existing theories for one or more of three general goals: to deepen and enhance understanding of existing theory; to synthesize existing theories into a new theory; or to generate a transcendent perspective about the social and/or natural world (Frauley, 2017;Turner, 1990;Wallis, 2010).…”
Section: Metatheory As a Cross-disciplinary Bridgementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Recently, van Knippenberg & Mell (2016) have argued that research on team diversity must cast a wider net in how we understand knowledge diversity, and Waller et al (2016) have emphasized the need to better account for team members as persons who have prethought ideas and preferences. We aim to provide such insights, and shed additional light on how it can be effectively managed, by complementing team-diversity research with insights from studies of knowledge in organizations.…”
Section: Knowledge Diversity and Team Performancementioning
confidence: 99%