Pastoralism, sustainability, and marketing. A review

Abstract

International audiencePastoralism is a highly traditional production system for livestock and livestock products. Under the surface of a seeming stability a variety of pressures of the modern time all seem to accumulate to put the sustainability of the pastoralist production system to the test. Population growth and growing demand for meat, put pressure on the natural resources used by pastoralists because the grazing lands that are saved from encroachment or conversion into arable lands, may be overexploited. Changing climatic conditions, such as frequent droughts, put even more pressure on the system. With so many challenges coming together, it is important to analyze whether pastoralism in itself can be considered a sustainable production system that in principle can cope with these challenges and thus deserves support from policy, or whether the pastoralist production system has fundamental misfit with today’s challenges, in the sense that it is detrimental to the world’s scarce resources. The scientific literature on pastoralism provides an important entry point to such fact finding. This article therefore analyzes 125 recent research contributions to the literature on pastoralism on their inferences as to whether pastoralism is a sustainable production system for livestock-based products. The results show substantial consensus that pastoralism is seen as a sustainable production system for livestock and livestock products (78 of the 125 studies contain sustainability inferences, of which 58 infer that the pastoral system is sustainable, while only 2 come to a negative conclusion). A total of 18 studies point however at conditional factors. The main factors that can potentially explain differences in the conclusions on whether pastoralism is sustainable pertain among others to the domain of sustainability, including abiotic and biotic factors representing the planet dimension, mobility, adaptation, indigenous knowledge, institutions and population growth as people-related factors, and economic contribution as a profit-related factor. Other factors include the ecosystem and land use types, policy instruments, constant/flexible stocking, controlled/mobile grazing, and diversification policies, as well as academic discipline, research methods and geographic focus. A quantitative test shows that consideration of adaptation, institutions and mobility are most strongly related to the sustainability inference. Such studies suggest that pastoralists that can adapt to external conditions, that are supported by effective institutions and that can exercise mobility, are more likely to behave sustainably. We argue that marketing can help to meet these conditions. Because the role of marketing has received scant attention in the context of pastoralists and because it has often been narrowly interpreted as market integration, we further explain the potential role of marketing in sustainable pastoralism. The role of marketing comes down to a strategic competence that enables pastoralists to create value for target buyers w...

How to avoid unsustainable side effects of managing climate risk in drylands — The supplementary feeding controversy

“…This result is in line with empirical evidence from arid rangelands, summarized in the theory of rangeland ecology at disequilibrium (Illius and O'Connor, 1999;Vetter et al, 2005) and with previous modeling studies on flexible destocking (Müller et al, 2007a;Martin et al, 2014). Our results on the importance of flexible stocking rates are also corroborated by stakeholder knowledge on adaptive rangeland management in other pastoral systems (see recent review in Tessema et al, 2014).…”

Increasing the Effectiveness of the “Great Green Wall” as an Adaptation to the Effects of Climate Change and Desertification in the Sahel

“…Grazing pressures, in particular, have resulted in soil compaction, erosion and a transition from high quality shrub and grazing lands to low-quality, low-value grasslands [43]. In Gambia, for example, fallow lands have been significantly reduced by a need to increase agricultural output [44], and in Nigeria, livestock populations grew 11-fold between 1950 and 2006, with the grazing needs of >66 million animals greatly exceeding the capacity of the grasslands [45].…”

Organic Carbon and Alkalinity Increase in Topsoil After Rangeland Restoration Through Atriplex nummularia Plantation

“…These processes are particularly severe in dry rangelands (Reynolds & Stafford Smith, 2002;Bedunah & Angerer, 2012). Population growth and growing demand for meat increase pressure on these systems, where the grazing lands that are saved from conversion into arable lands are often overexploited (Turner, 2011;Tessema et al, 2014). Intensification and sedentarization policies, along with the increased availability of water (e.g.…”