2014
DOI: 10.1109/tgrs.2012.2237408
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Patch-Based Information Reconstruction of Cloud-Contaminated Multitemporal Images

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
46
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 93 publications
(46 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
0
46
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Substitution approaches were used to fill in cloudy pixels using information from adjacent cloud-free pixels in the same image. Otherwise information was retrieved for the corresponding pixels from previous time periods [25,26]. In addition to methods applied directly to NDVI, data recovery techniques for other types of similar data are also informative.…”
Section: Data Recovery Using Empirical Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Substitution approaches were used to fill in cloudy pixels using information from adjacent cloud-free pixels in the same image. Otherwise information was retrieved for the corresponding pixels from previous time periods [25,26]. In addition to methods applied directly to NDVI, data recovery techniques for other types of similar data are also informative.…”
Section: Data Recovery Using Empirical Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Multi-temporal dictionary learning algorithms have been able to efficiently reduce clouds and accurately reconstruct contaminated surficial information underlying large-scale clouds and shadows [29]. A new patch matching multi-temporal group sparse representation (PM-MTGSR) method has also been proposed for the reconstruction of the optical remote sensing missing data [26]. They suggested that the method is suitable for thick cloud cover or cases of sensor failure.…”
Section: Data Recovery Using Empirical Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Of course, many approaches have been designed to overcome this problem (vanDijk et al, 1987;Viovy et al, 1992;Roerink et al, 2000;Chen et al, 2004;Beck et al, 2006;Ma and Veroustraete, 2006;Hird and McDermid, 2009;Julien and Sobrino, 2010;Cho and Suh, 2013;Ke et al, 2013;Lin et al, 2014;Michishita et al, 2014;Moreno et al, 2014;Xiao et al, 2015;Xu et al, 2015;Yang et al, 2015;Zhou et al, 2015). These approaches, termed time series reconstruction -or gap-filling-methods, aim at providing alternative data for cloud-contaminated observations.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These existing methods can be divided into three categories: (1) spatial-based methods; (2) spectralbased methods; and (3) temporal-based methods [1].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Lin et al proposed replacing the missing image using optimal information from the same region in a referenced image when the time interval between the missing image and the referenced image is short enough [1]. The method appeared to demonstrate better results than a method proposed by the joint U.S. Geological Survey (USGS) Landsat team to reconstruct data gaps in SLC-off images (i.e., images taken when the Scan Line Corrector (SLC) is not available) [8]; however, the result of this method depends greatly on the selected sampling, and therefore its accuracy is uncertain.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%