1988
DOI: 10.2307/1467303
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Patch Dynamics in Lotic Systems: The Stream as a Mosaic

Abstract: This paper applies concepts of landscape ecology and patch dynamics to lotic systems. We present a framework for the investigation of pattern and process in lotic ecosystems that considers how specific patch characteristics determine biotic and abiotic processes over various scales. Patch characteristics include: size, size distribution within the landscape, juxtaposition, diversity, duration, and mechanisms affecting patch formation. Several topics of current interest in lotic ecology are examined from a patc… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

13
347
1
8

Year Published

1996
1996
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 533 publications
(369 citation statements)
references
References 114 publications
13
347
1
8
Order By: Relevance
“…One, reported by Schoener (1974) and other investigators (MacArthur & Pianka, 1966;MacArthur & Levins, 1964;Ross, 1986) is spatial segregation, which could more consistently contribute to the differentiation of niches in narrower tracks. Therefore, low species richness does not necessarily lead to wider trophic breadth, but on the other hand, specialized trophic niches would be a consequence of morphological limitations associated with feeding resources in habitat mosaics (Pringle et al, 1988). This hypothesis gains support because the dietary overlap of this assemblage was high only for those congeneric species with similar morphologies.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…One, reported by Schoener (1974) and other investigators (MacArthur & Pianka, 1966;MacArthur & Levins, 1964;Ross, 1986) is spatial segregation, which could more consistently contribute to the differentiation of niches in narrower tracks. Therefore, low species richness does not necessarily lead to wider trophic breadth, but on the other hand, specialized trophic niches would be a consequence of morphological limitations associated with feeding resources in habitat mosaics (Pringle et al, 1988). This hypothesis gains support because the dietary overlap of this assemblage was high only for those congeneric species with similar morphologies.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This dimension includes the whole alluvial plain, defined as a mosaic of homoge neous patches on the physico-chemical and biological plan (Johnston & Naiman 1987, Pringle et al 1988, as well as the transverse bi-directional exchanges control ling interactions within this mosaic (Amoros & Roux 1988, Junk et al 1989, Bayley 1995.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Actually, Benke [36] thinks that the quantity and the quality of foods constitute the most important limiting factors for the benthic production. Murphy et al [39], Pringle et al [40] and Dangles [41] affirm that the benthic accumulation of the allochthonous detritus in the forest headwaters streams is an important resource colonized by macroinvertebrates for eating and having shelter. Chadwick and Huryn [42] and Smock et al [43], studying the role of the habitat in the determination of macrobenthic production, have concluded that the production was always high on the bottom rich in plant debris than that of sandy one.…”
Section: Atyid Shrimps Production and Biomass Turnover In Masanga Mabmentioning
confidence: 99%