2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.cag.2014.09.022
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Patch layout generation by detecting feature networks

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
27
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(27 citation statements)
references
References 42 publications
0
27
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Existing explicit methods [7,8,36] start by pruning away weak feature lines. Afterwards, Lévy et al [36] as well as Mitani and Suzuki [7] consider the watershed of the distance function from the pruned feature lines and merge small patches, while Cao et al [8] directly extend and connect pruned feature lines. Both methods are based on heuristics that are controlled by several thresholds.…”
Section: Surface Segmentationmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…Existing explicit methods [7,8,36] start by pruning away weak feature lines. Afterwards, Lévy et al [36] as well as Mitani and Suzuki [7] consider the watershed of the distance function from the pruned feature lines and merge small patches, while Cao et al [8] directly extend and connect pruned feature lines. Both methods are based on heuristics that are controlled by several thresholds.…”
Section: Surface Segmentationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Also, note that the curve networks produced by the feature extension method of Ref. [8] (without the subsequent stage of refinement) are not guaranteed to yield a segmentation of the surface. For example, a closed curve on a high-genus surface does not necessarily partition the surface into two patches.…”
Section: Surface Segmentationmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations