Patch Testing

Wahlberg, Jan E.; Lindberg, Magnus

doi:10.1007/3-540-31301-x_22

Cited by 123 publications

(68 citation statements)

References 121 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…Therefore, understanding if and how patch-test reactions can be influenced by weather conditions could further improve the diagnostic performance of the test. A consideration of ambient conditions could, for instance, prompt an adjustment of the interpretation of reactions, re-testing, or confirmation with validation procedures such as repeated open-application testing (5).…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 1 more Smart Citation

Meteorological conditions and the diagnosis of occupationally related contact sensitizations

Hegewald¹,

Uter²,

Kränke³

et al. 2008

Scand J Work Environ Health

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Patch tests were applied to the skin for 1 or 2 days. Patch-test readings were taken on the third day after the initial test application and classified on morphological grounds according to international guidelines (5). Of the 61 780 patients tested with the occupational allergens, 63% were female.…”

Section: Study Population and Methodsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Meteorological conditions and the diagnosis of occupationally related contact sensitizations

Hegewald¹,

Uter²,

Kränke³

et al. 2008

Scand J Work Environ Health

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

“…The 5 plant extracts (5% v/v) were applied with Haye's test chambers (HAIJE SERVICE B.V., Washington, USA) to a 70 cm 2 area of skin on each volunteer's back. The test materials were removed after 48 h and the treated sites were examined after 30 min, 24 h, and 48 h. Five types of reactions were classified according to the International Contact Dermatitis Research Group (ICDRG) scoring system [18]. The five reactions include negative reaction (-), possible reaction (±, faint erythema only), weak positive reaction (+, erythema, infiltration, and possible papules), strong positive reaction (++, erythema, infiltration, papules or vesicles), and extreme positive reaction (+++, intense erythema, infiltration, and coalescing vesicles).…”

Section: Human Skin Patch Testingmentioning

confidence: 99%

Assessment and Comparison of the Skin Irritation Potential of Five Plant Extracts Using In Vitro and In Vivo Methods

Su¹,

Quan²,

Zhao³

et al. 2017

Am. J. Biomed. Sci.

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The aim of this paper was to evaluate the skin irritant potential of five plant extracts for cosmetic use by in vitro and in vivo methods and to analyze the correlation between these different methods. Cell viability in fibroblasts and in the reconstructed human skin model was measured using the MTT assay to test cytotoxicity, and ELISA was used to detect IL-8 release. Finally, human skin patch tests were performed to validate the results obtained using the in vitro methods. The human patch results were compared with IL-8 release results in fibroblasts and the MTT assay findings in Episkin TM . The MTT assay in fibroblasts showed that the five plant extracts exhibited low cytotoxicity. The human patch results showed that four of the five plant extracts showed weak irritant potential. The MTT assay results in Episkin TM were best correlated with the human patch test results with a Spearman's correlation coefficient of 0.6156. The Spearman's correlation coefficient between the human patch test and IL-8 release results was 0.4617. The MTT assay in Episkin TM was more sensitive than the IL-8 release assay in fibroblasts to evaluate skin irritant potential. Our findings indicate that the five plant extracts are safe for cosmetic use.

show abstract

“…Olası iritan reaksiyonların yanlış pozitifliğe neden olmaması için ilk değerlendirme 30 dakika sonra yapıldı, 72. saatte ikinci kez değerlendirildi. Pozitif reaksiyonlar Uluslararası Kontakt Dermatit Çalışma Grubu'nun kriterleri doğrultusunda, bu konuda yeterli deneyimi bulunan tek ve aynı doktor tarafından yorumlandı 8 . Yama testi uygulanan hastaların en az 3 hafta öncesinden itibaren topikal ve 3 ay öncesinden itibaren sistemik herhangi bir tedavi almıyor olmasına dikkat edildi.…”

Section: Yama Testi Uygulamasıunclassified

Evaluation of patients with oral lichenoid lesions by dental patch testing and results of removal of the dental restoration material

Sahin¹,

Çetinözman²,

Avcu³

et al. 2016

TURKDERM

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Background and Design: Oral lichenoid lesions (OLL) are contact stomatitis characterized by white reticular or erosive patches, plaque-like lesions that are clinically and histopathologically indistinguishable from oral lichen planus (OLP). Amalgam dental fillings and dental restoration materials are among the etiologic agents. In the present study, it was aimed to evaluate the standard and dental series patch tests in patients with OLL in comparison to a control group and evaluate our results. Materials and Methods: Thirty-three patients with OLL or OLP and 30 healthy control subjects, who had at least one dental restoration material and/or dental filling, were included in the study. Both groups received standard series and dental patch test and the results were evaluated simultaneously.

show abstract

Patch Testing

Cited by 123 publications

References 121 publications

Meteorological conditions and the diagnosis of occupationally related contact sensitizations

Meteorological conditions and the diagnosis of occupationally related contact sensitizations

Assessment and Comparison of the Skin Irritation Potential of Five Plant Extracts Using In Vitro and In Vivo Methods

Evaluation of patients with oral lichenoid lesions by dental patch testing and results of removal of the dental restoration material

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About