Patch testing with components of water‐based metalworking fluids: results of a multicentre study with a second series

Geier, Johannes; Lessmann, Holger; Becker, Detlef; Bruze, M.; Frosch, Peter J.; Fuchs, Thomas; Jappe, Uta; Koch, Patrick; Pföhler, Claudia; Skudlik, Christoph

doi:10.1111/j.1600-0536.2006.00993.x

Cited by 52 publications

(30 citation statements)

References 25 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…Disinfectants intended for use in operating theatres often have a complex composition, which can occasionally lead to contact allergy. Myristyl alcohol remains a difficult test substance, with frequent doubtful reactions . However, we found 1 case with an occupationally relevant contact allergy, which shows that testing can be valuable in selected cases.…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 71%

Hand eczema and occupational contact allergies in healthcare workers with a focus on rubber additives

et al. 2018

Self Cite

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 71%

Hand eczema and occupational contact allergies in healthcare workers with a focus on rubber additives

et al. 2018

Self Cite

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Other possibilities for negative patch test include: incorrect concentration of the allergen used for testing, contact urticaria and photo-contact dermatitis (Johnston, 2009;Geier et al, 2006;Wang et al, 2011).…”

Section: Diagnosismentioning

confidence: 96%

Management of contact dermatitis

Al-Otaibi

Alqahtani

2015

Journal of Dermatology & Dermatologic Surgery

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Skin disorders compromise more than 35% of all occupationally related disorders. Most of these are contact dermatitis as a result from contact with a chemical substance. Contact dermatitis can be either irritant or allergic type. Each type has a different mechanism while the clinical presentation is the same. Management of contact dermatitis must include both medical treatment and workplace modifications as appropriate to reduce exposure to the causative agents. Physicians should be aware of this preventable medical condition. Ó 2015 The Authors. Production and hosting by Elsevier B.V. on behalf of King Saud University. This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).

show abstract

“…Cetyl alcohol is a wellrecognized contact allergen (Blondeel et al, 1978;Tosti et al, 1996;Oiso et al, 2003;Aakhus and Warshaw, 2011). in cosmetic products (Andersen and Broesby-Olsen, 2006) and metal-working fluids (Tosti et al, 1996;Geier et al, 2006). Stearyl alcohol is reported to be a very weak contact allergen (Tosti et al, 1996;Yesudian and King, 2001;Thormann et al, 2009).…”

Section: Reactivity and Reaction Productsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Scientific Opinion on the evaluation of the substances currently on the list in the annex to Commission Directive 96/3/EC as acceptable previous cargoes for edible fats and oils - Part II of III

2012

EFSA Journal

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Shipping of edible fats and oils into Europe is permitted in bulk tanks, in which substances, included in a positive list, had been previously transported. The European Commission requested EFSA to evaluate the list of substances in the Annex to Commission Directive 96/3/EC as acceptable previous cargoes for edible fats and oils, taking into account its review of the Scientific Committee on Food (SCF) criteria for acceptable previous cargoes and criteria proposed by the Codex Committee for Fats and Oils. This is the second of three scientific opinions by the Panel on Contaminants in the Food Chain (CONTAM Panel), in which thirty-five of these substances or groups of substances have been evaluated. The CONTAM Panel concluded that fatty acids, fatty alcohols, fatty alcohol blends, fatty acid methyl esters, fatty acid esters, and animal, marine and vegetable and hydrogenated oils and fats, all as specified, and acid oils and fatty acid distillates, acetic acid, sulphuric acid, formic acid, acetic anhydride, acetone, n-heptane, n-hexane, cyclohexane, pentane, iso-propanol, propyl alcohol, methyl isobutyl ketone, methyl ethyl ketone, n-propyl acetate, ammonium hydroxide, limonene, methyl tertbutyl ether, urea ammonia nitrate solution, calcium chloride solution, magnesium chloride solution, potable water, potassium hydroxide, sodium hydroxide, silicon dioxide, sorbitol, molasses and beeswax would not be of health concern as previous cargoes. However, because of its insolubility in water and high melting point, silicon dioxide is not suitable for transport in tankers for edible fats and oils. There was insufficient information available on the composition of wine lees for the CONTAM Panel to conclude that it would not be of health concern when used as a previous cargo. The CONTAM Panel made several recommendations regarding the way in which the substances are described in the Annex to Commission Directive 96/3/EC, to correct inaccuracies and to better reflect current transport practices. for the preparatory work on this scientific opinion and the hearing expert John Hancock, and EFSA staff: Gina Cioacata and Luisa Ramos Bordajandi for the support provided to this scientific opinion. 4 Corrections have been made to Section 3.3.3 and to Section Conclusions (page 107, second bullet) for the entry on -Fatty alcohols (individually specified)‖ to list enanthyl alcohol (1-heptanol) and nonyl alcohol (1-nonanol) that due to an omission were not listed. The changes do not affect the overall conclusions of the opinion. To avoid confusion, the original version of the opinion has been removed from the website, but is available on request, as is a version showing all the changes made. Re-evaluation of acceptable previous cargoes for edible fats and oils -Part II of III EFSA Journal 2012;10(5):2703 2 © European Food Safety Authority, 2012 KEY WORDS Acceptable previous cargo, edible fats and oils, sea transport, criteria for acceptability of previous cargoes Re-evaluation of acceptable previous cargoes for edible fats and oils -Part I...

show abstract

Patch testing with components of water‐based metalworking fluids: results of a multicentre study with a second series

Abstract: 4,4'-methylenebis morpholine may be an important MWF allergen, although clinical relevance could not be stated definitely in every case. Myristyl alcohol should not be patch tested at 10% pet., but at a lesser concentration, due to irritant properties.

Cited by 52 publications

References 25 publications

Hand eczema and occupational contact allergies in healthcare workers with a focus on rubber additives

Hand eczema and occupational contact allergies in healthcare workers with a focus on rubber additives

Management of contact dermatitis

Scientific Opinion on the evaluation of the substances currently on the list in the annex to Commission Directive 96/3/EC as acceptable previous cargoes for edible fats and oils - Part II of III

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About