2020
DOI: 10.1111/cod.13591
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Patch testing with methylchloroisothiazolinone/methylisothiazolinone—Comparison of results with TRUE Test and 200 ppm aq., and methylisothiazolinone patch test outcome

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 3 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The prevalence of contact allergy to MI alone is increasing and was found to be 2.5% in 2012, 5.6% in 2013, 6.8% in 2014 (Yu et al, 2016), and 13.36% in 2015–2016 (DeKoven et al, 2018). Furthermore, there are patients who may only test positive to MI alone and not the MI/MCI combination (Matellanes-Palacios et al, 2020). Because of this, testing with the T.R.U.E Test alone would miss a significant number of patients with this allergy.…”
Section: The Acds Core Allergen Series: Testing For 80mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The prevalence of contact allergy to MI alone is increasing and was found to be 2.5% in 2012, 5.6% in 2013, 6.8% in 2014 (Yu et al, 2016), and 13.36% in 2015–2016 (DeKoven et al, 2018). Furthermore, there are patients who may only test positive to MI alone and not the MI/MCI combination (Matellanes-Palacios et al, 2020). Because of this, testing with the T.R.U.E Test alone would miss a significant number of patients with this allergy.…”
Section: The Acds Core Allergen Series: Testing For 80mentioning
confidence: 99%