2011
DOI: 10.3102/0162373710392371
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Patching the Pipeline

Abstract: For more than 40 years, there has been a concerted national effort to promote diversity among the scientific research community. Yet given the persistent national-level disparity in educational achievements of students from various ethnic and racial groups, the efficacy of these programs has come into question. The current study reports results from a longitudinal study of students supported by a national National Institutes of Health–funded minority training program, and a propensity score matched control. Gr… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

7
85
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 212 publications
(92 citation statements)
references
References 35 publications
7
85
0
Order By: Relevance
“…DeFreitas and Bravo (2012) did not find a relationship between informal faculty mentoring and academic achievement among underrepresented minority (URM) students attending a Hispanic Serving Institution (HSI). Similarly, a study of a National Institutes of Health (NIH) minority research training program by Schultz et al (2011) did not find a significant relationship between having a "scientific mentor" and student intentions and persistence in science (p. 101).…”
Section: Academic Progress and Successmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…DeFreitas and Bravo (2012) did not find a relationship between informal faculty mentoring and academic achievement among underrepresented minority (URM) students attending a Hispanic Serving Institution (HSI). Similarly, a study of a National Institutes of Health (NIH) minority research training program by Schultz et al (2011) did not find a significant relationship between having a "scientific mentor" and student intentions and persistence in science (p. 101).…”
Section: Academic Progress and Successmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…First, there are nationally funded programs, such as the National Science Foundation Research Experiences for Undergraduates, that allocate funds for UR at the institutional level (https://www.nsf.gov/crssprgm/reu/). The purpose of these programs is to reduce racial/ethnic disparities in graduate education (Schultz et al, 2011) and to retain students in fields seen as needing more graduates, including STEM (Kendricks et al, 2013). Although undergraduate research experiences and corresponding mentorship have been situated predominantly in STEM fields, the importance of and interest in undergraduate research including best practices for mentors in other disciplines is increasing.…”
Section: Program Focus and Purposementioning
confidence: 99%
“…3) Provide opportunities for students in community colleges and minority-serving undergraduate institutions to gain research experience in Chemical Oceanography (e.g., undergraduate summer research programs that partner these institutions with research-focused institutions). Experience in other science fields (e.g., Hurtado et al, 2009;Schultz et al, 2011) indicates that such programs are important both to recruit underrepresented students to our field and to prepare them to apply for and succeed in Chemical Oceanography graduate programs.…”
Section: Aj Fassbender Et Almentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Government agencies such as the National Institutes of Health (NIH) and the NSF have addressed this education and workforce gap directly through funding of diversity research and science education programs, which are primarily focused on the recruitment and retention of URM in STEM. These programs vary from summer and academic-year research experiences to innovative STEM curricula in the classroom (Chaplin, Manske, & Cuise, 1998;Mervis, 2010;NRC, 2005;Schultz et al, 2011). Involvement in research has long been considered a key factor in retaining students in STEM (Bauer & Bennett, 2003;Russell, Hancock, & McCullough, 2007).…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%