2006
DOI: 10.1162/rest.88.4.774
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Patent Citations as a Measure of Knowledge Flows: The Influence of Examiner Citations

Abstract: Abstract-Analysis of patent citations is a core methodology in the study of knowledge diffusion. However, citations made by patent examiners have not been separately reported, adding unknown noise to the data. We leverage a recent change in the reporting of patent data showing citations added by examiners. The magnitude is high: two-thirds of citations on the average patent are inserted by examiners. Furthermore, 40% of all patents have all citations added by examiners. We analyze the distribution of examiner … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
326
3
1

Year Published

2009
2009
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 632 publications
(331 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
1
326
3
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Especially in the EPO system, which we are using for our research, it is the patent examiner of the patent office who is ultimately responsible for including all the patent citations that are necessary, and not the inventor. Together this might also be the reason why Criscuolo and Verspagen's (2008) finding that inventor citations and examiner citations in EPO do not track each other differs from the findings of Alcacer and Gittelman (2006) for USPTO. Also in terms of legal reasons inventor and non-inventor citations in USPTO will track each other more closely than these citations will do in EPO.…”
Section: Datamentioning
confidence: 94%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Especially in the EPO system, which we are using for our research, it is the patent examiner of the patent office who is ultimately responsible for including all the patent citations that are necessary, and not the inventor. Together this might also be the reason why Criscuolo and Verspagen's (2008) finding that inventor citations and examiner citations in EPO do not track each other differs from the findings of Alcacer and Gittelman (2006) for USPTO. Also in terms of legal reasons inventor and non-inventor citations in USPTO will track each other more closely than these citations will do in EPO.…”
Section: Datamentioning
confidence: 94%
“…The reason being that large parts of patent citations may not be related to a particular knowledge flow due to the fact that patent citations are included not only by the inventor, but as well by the patent attorney of the firm and the patent examiner in the patent office. Recent research has concentrated on the distinction between inventor citations and non-inventor citations (Alcacer and Gittelman, 2006;Criscuolo and Verspagen, 2008). Where Criscuolo and Verspagen propose only to consider inventor citations as knowledge flows, Alcacer and Gittelman conclude that the bias introduced by the examiner citations is not necessarily bad, since both inventor citations and examiner citations might track each other closely.…”
Section: Datamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This is a flow measure that directly reflects the increase in the stock of technological knowledge available in an economic system. 5 Accordingly, patents have been extensively used in the management and economics literature to measure knowledge flows (e.g., Griliches, 1990;Jaffe et al, 1993 and1998;Almeida and Kogut, 1999;Popp, 2003 and2005;Alcacer and Gittelman, 2006). As such, patent data are potentially more precise than other measures of innovation since they refer to concrete and successfully terminated knowledge generating activities that are the result of the recombination of codified knowledge based on research and development efforts and the stock of tacit knowledge based upon learning processes.…”
Section: Econometric Strategymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Recent research suggests that high levels of examiner citations are associated with low quality patents (Alcácer and Gittelman 2006;Sampat 2009. Therefore, including these citations adds a new set of observations -patents whose citations are 100% examiner-imposed -that may represent inferior innovations.…”
Section: Robustness Checksmentioning
confidence: 99%