2011 Eighth International Conference on Fuzzy Systems and Knowledge Discovery (FSKD) 2011
DOI: 10.1109/fskd.2011.6019821
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Patent collaborative filtering recommendation approach based on patent similarity

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Personalized patent searches enrich retrieval results by utilizing semantic information in patent classification, textual descriptions and external knowledge. For example, to filter patents for enterprises, Ji et al (2011) utilized semantic information in patent classification to enhance conventional CF. To address term mismatches when retrieving prior art to a patent application, Mahdabi et al (2013) Recommending patent citations helps patent examiners identify prior information relevant to patent applications efficiently and effectively.…”
Section: Patent Recommendationmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Personalized patent searches enrich retrieval results by utilizing semantic information in patent classification, textual descriptions and external knowledge. For example, to filter patents for enterprises, Ji et al (2011) utilized semantic information in patent classification to enhance conventional CF. To address term mismatches when retrieving prior art to a patent application, Mahdabi et al (2013) Recommending patent citations helps patent examiners identify prior information relevant to patent applications efficiently and effectively.…”
Section: Patent Recommendationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Moreover, a large proportion of high-quality patents are held by research institutions and have not been transferred. For solving these problems, state-of-the-art patent recommendation methods leverage rich information in patent documents to identify matched patents in different contexts, such as filtering patents for personalized retrieval, suggesting patent citations and recommending patents for potential buyers (Ji et al, 2011;Oh et al, 2013;Rui and Min, 2016;Wang et al, 2019b;Wu et al, 2013). Most of these existing methods focus on improving the recommendation accuracy while ignoring the interpretability of recommendation results.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…CF recommendation recommends patents to users according to their similar interests, and the recommendation sets can be extended unlike with topic model-based methods . Ji et al [12] calculated the similarity between patents with the patent model tree, on the basis of which conventional CF can be improved by filling a sparse user rating matrix with patent similarity. Trappey et al [13] clustered users with similar patent search behaviours to identify users’ neighbours and inferred new patent recommendations based on intercluster group member behaviours and characteristics.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Automatic patent recommendation has been investigated in many contexts such as personalised patent retrieval, patent citation recommendation and patent trading recommendation [7][8][9]. Previous studies mainly used topic models [10,11] and collaborative filtering (CF) methods [12,13] for patent recommendation. Given the advantages of cutting-edge techniques in capturing relations between potential patent buyers and candidate patents, graph analysis [14,15] and deep neural networks (DNNs) [16] were introduced to improve patent trading recommendation.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%