2021
DOI: 10.1001/jama.2021.21317
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Patent Foramen Ovale Closure—Harnessing Clinical Trial Evidence to Inform Individualized Treatment Decisions

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…As mentioned in recent investigations, risk reduction for recurrent stroke with device closure varied across groups classified by their probabilities that the stroke was causally related to the PFO. 27,28 Meanwhile, both the uncertainties regarding the degree of benefit after closure and the higher risk of AF should be considered in the decision-making process when evaluating old patients with presumed PFO-related stroke.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As mentioned in recent investigations, risk reduction for recurrent stroke with device closure varied across groups classified by their probabilities that the stroke was causally related to the PFO. 27,28 Meanwhile, both the uncertainties regarding the degree of benefit after closure and the higher risk of AF should be considered in the decision-making process when evaluating old patients with presumed PFO-related stroke.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Despite our encouraging results, we suggest that patients with a known ASD/PFO contemplating TJA should be evaluated by the cardiology team to determine the possible benefits and risks of defect closure, particularly in patients with predisposing factors for thromboembolism [ 6 ]. Four recent studies demonstrated significant reductions in rate of recurrent stroke after PFO closure in comparison to medical treatment, and the American Academy of Neurology redefined the guidelines accordingly [ [16] , [17] , [18] , [19] , [20] ]. Murphy et al.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The role of patent foramen ovale closure was previously controversial in cryptogenic stroke. However, several recent trials have provided new data on the role of patent foramen ovale closure for secondary stroke prevention [58]. Consequently, the American Academy of Neurology released a practice update in 2020 stating that it is reasonable to recommend patent foramen ovale (PFO) closure in patients under 60 with embolic appearing stroke, with no other apparent mechanism of stroke, after careful consideration of the risks and benefits of the procedure [59 ▪▪ ].…”
Section: Specific Considerations By Stroke Etiologymentioning
confidence: 99%