2014
DOI: 10.1257/aer.104.7.1979
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Patent Laws, Product Life-Cycle Lengths, and Multinational Activity

Abstract: Do intellectual property rights influence multinationals' manufacturing location decisions? My theoretical model indicates that countries with strong patent laws attract multinational activity, but only in sectors with relatively long product life cycles. By contrast, firms with short life-cycle technologies are insensitive, because offshore imitation is less likely to succeed before obsolescence. I document strong empirical regularities consistent with the model using a panel dataset on the global operations … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

3
78
0
3

Year Published

2015
2015
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
2
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 110 publications
(84 citation statements)
references
References 55 publications
3
78
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…First, I clarify that controlling for industry fixed effects should mitigate this concern to the extent that product development cycles are industry-specific. Second, in Row (15), I follow Bilir (2014) to classify industries by their product lifecycle and show that results hold excluding industries with intermediate (around 9 years) to long product cycles (between 10 and 11 years).…”
Section: Robustness Checksmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…First, I clarify that controlling for industry fixed effects should mitigate this concern to the extent that product development cycles are industry-specific. Second, in Row (15), I follow Bilir (2014) to classify industries by their product lifecycle and show that results hold excluding industries with intermediate (around 9 years) to long product cycles (between 10 and 11 years).…”
Section: Robustness Checksmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Next to be focused would be the different technology transfer requirements imposed by the host country. Forcing MNCs to hire local labour, making their technologies available to local entrepreneurs, restricting imports, requiring them to avail suppliers locally are some of the impositions of the host country that affect the MNC's profit maximizing behaviour thus depressing the amount of technology transfer (Kokko, 1992 (Nune H., 2012;Berry, 2014), host country market size (Gunnar, 1996), GDP and fixed entry costs (Hayakawa et al, 2010) the laws, rules and regulations, systems and policies, customs, traditions and norms of the host country (Chesbrough, 1999), Intellectual Property Rights (William, 2014& Bilir, 2014, FDI supportive environment (Shujiro et al, 2006), tax policies and tax credits (James, R., 1994;Maskus, 2004), economical and technological advancements (Cantwell, 1998), technology policies technology licensing payments , capital market restrictions, R&D expenditures (Maskus, 2004) and domestic competition (Sinani and Meyer, 2004).…”
Section: Effect Of Host Country Traits On Technology Transfermentioning
confidence: 99%
“…While several studies using aggregate data suggests that it does, an excellent paper using micro data noted that the impacts vary with product features, most importantly the length of a standard product life cycle across industries (Bilir 2014). The author developed a measure of product obsolescence and related US multinational activity across countries to the GP index and other controls.…”
Section: Impacts Of Iprs On Technology Transfermentioning
confidence: 99%