Patents, Meet Napster: 3D Printing and the Digitization of Things

Desai, Deven R.; Magliocca, Gerard N.

doi:10.31228/osf.io/3urhd

Cited by 11 publications

(4 citation statements)

References 1 publication

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…Действующие законы и подзаконные нормативные акты, регулирующие права на интеллектуальную собственность, изданы до появления 3d-печати и поэтому непосредственно не охватывают всех ее возможностей. Медицинские устройства являются утилитарными, а не художественными объектами и поэтому не имеют основания для защиты авторских прав [17,18].…”

Section: правовое регулирование изготовления медицинских изделий с исunclassified

“…в настоящее время fda изучает технологии 3d-печати, чтобы получить знания и опыт, необходимые для оценки безопасности, эффективности и качества изделий, разработанных в рамках процесса аддитивного производства. по мере коммерциализации медицинских изделий 3d-печати соблюдение законодательства в области интеллектуальной собственности приобретет все большее значение для производителей медицинских изделий [18,19].…”

Section: контроль качества и копирования в сшаunclassified

See 1 more Smart Citation

Regulatory Concerns about Medical Device Manufacturing Using 3D Printing: Current State of the Issue

Карякин¹,

Шубняков²,

Денисов³

et al. 2018

Traumatology and Orthopedics of Russia

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Custom-made implants, orthotics, orthoses, models for surgical planning and education, and much more are now created using 3D printers. In this article, the authors suiiunarized information on laws and regulations in the domain of legal support for 3D printing of medical devices in Russia and abroad. 3D printing is one of the promising avenues in developing new methods of treatment, so iiiunediate establishing of clear criteria for its legal regulation is necessary. As is, there are still many gaps in the legislative framework. The issues of the quality of 3D models, material standardization and manufacturing processes using 3D printing technologies remain unresolved. When using custom-made medical devices, respecting the rights of patients and preventing the use of prohibited or restricted materials are essential. Yet, legal barriers to this irmovative direction of medicine must be avoided.

show abstract

Section: правовое регулирование изготовления медицинских изделий с исunclassified

Section: контроль качества и копирования в сшаunclassified

Regulatory Concerns about Medical Device Manufacturing Using 3D Printing: Current State of the Issue

Карякин¹,

Шубняков²,

Денисов³

et al. 2018

Traumatology and Orthopedics of Russia

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…The Maker Movement: Copyright Law, Remix Culture And 3D Printing 83 In terms of patentable subject matter, 3D printing has a wide range of applications. 208 The Supreme Court of the United States has sought to delimit the boundaries of eligible patentable subject matter in a string of casesincluding Bilski, Prometheus, Myriad, and Alice. 209 While some forms of 3D printing will be well within the boundaries of eligible patentable subject matter, particular 3D printing technologies in information technology, medicine, and biotechnology could be more contentious.…”

Section: ]mentioning

confidence: 99%

The Maker Movement: Copyright Law, Remix Culture and 3D Printing

Rimmer¹

2017

Preprint

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Some parts of the products-for example, electronic chips-are too costprohibitive at present for 3D printing. Also, the firm may be worried about the intellectual property (IP) risks, since the product's computerized design (code) can be shared over the Internet (Desai & Magliocca, 2013). Product liability is another important concern (Wang, 2016).…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Personal fabrication as an operational strategy: Value of delegating production to customer using 3D printing

Sethuraman

Parlaktürk

Swaminathan

2023

Production and Operations Management

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

There is a growing interest in the industry around 3D printing. A related phenomenon is personal fabrication (PF) in which a firm sells products' design and lets the customers personalize and manufacture the product using 3D printing services. In this paper, we characterize the market and operational conditions that make PF an attractive operational strategy. We propose a demand market model that captures customer heterogeneity in taste (horizontal) and quality (vertical) dimensions while allowing the market to be skewed with high versus low valuation customers. We quantify three key benefits of PF strategy: (i) the PF strategy enables personalization and improves product fit, (ii) the PF strategy can help the firm through postponement of product configuration, and (iii) the PF strategy enables easier design adjustments and allows design for manufacturability initiatives. Intellectual property and liability risks are significant barriers to the adoption of PF strategy. Furthermore, 3D printing may not be feasible for some parts of the product. In these cases, the firm may pursue the partial PF strategy: delegating only a proportion of the product for customer production. We also identify when partial PF becomes an attractive strategy.

show abstract

Patents, Meet Napster: 3D Printing and the Digitization of Things

Abstract: 102 Georgetown Law Journal 1691 (2013)

Cited by 11 publications

References 1 publication

Regulatory Concerns about Medical Device Manufacturing Using 3D Printing: Current State of the Issue

Regulatory Concerns about Medical Device Manufacturing Using 3D Printing: Current State of the Issue

The Maker Movement: Copyright Law, Remix Culture and 3D Printing

Personal fabrication as an operational strategy: Value of delegating production to customer using 3D printing

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About