1998
DOI: 10.2135/cropsci1998.0011183x003800050004x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Path Analyses of Yield and Yield‐Related Traits of Fifteen Diverse Rice Genotypes

Abstract: Literature on the path analyses of grain yield and at least 14 yield related traits in a path diagram that is organized with at least second order variables has been lacking. The objectives of this study were to obtain and interpret information on the nature of interrelationships between first‐, second‐, and third‐order yield‐related traits and rice (Oryza sativa L.) grain yield. Fifteen rice genotypes were used in this study to represent the combinations of low and high levels of four traits that were identif… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

15
115
0
9

Year Published

2004
2004
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 140 publications
(139 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
15
115
0
9
Order By: Relevance
“…Guna mengetahui pengaruh langsung dan tidak langsung genotipik dan fenotipik terhadap kemajuan seleksi dilakukan analisis sidik lintas dengan formulasi sebagai berikut (Samonte et al, 1998) R1y = P1y + r12P2y + r13P3y +…+ r1nPny R2y = r12P1y +P2y + r23P3y +…+ r2nPny Rny = r1nP1y + r2nP2y + r3nP3y +…+ Pny R1y = Koefisien korelasi sederhana secara genotipik dan fenotipik dari sifat ke-1 dengan sifat Y (hasil) R2y = Koefisien korelasi sederhana secara genotipik dan fenotipik dari sifat ke-2 dengan sifat Y (hasil) P1y = Pengaruh langsung secara genotipik dan fenotipik dari sifat ke-1 terhadap Y (hasil) Pny = Pengaruh langsung secara genotipik dan fenotipik dari sifat ke-n terhadap Y (hasil) r1nPny = Pengaruh tidak langsung secara genotipik dan fenotipik dari sifat ke-1 terhadap Y (hasil)…”
Section: Bahan Dan Metodeunclassified
“…Guna mengetahui pengaruh langsung dan tidak langsung genotipik dan fenotipik terhadap kemajuan seleksi dilakukan analisis sidik lintas dengan formulasi sebagai berikut (Samonte et al, 1998) R1y = P1y + r12P2y + r13P3y +…+ r1nPny R2y = r12P1y +P2y + r23P3y +…+ r2nPny Rny = r1nP1y + r2nP2y + r3nP3y +…+ Pny R1y = Koefisien korelasi sederhana secara genotipik dan fenotipik dari sifat ke-1 dengan sifat Y (hasil) R2y = Koefisien korelasi sederhana secara genotipik dan fenotipik dari sifat ke-2 dengan sifat Y (hasil) P1y = Pengaruh langsung secara genotipik dan fenotipik dari sifat ke-1 terhadap Y (hasil) Pny = Pengaruh langsung secara genotipik dan fenotipik dari sifat ke-n terhadap Y (hasil) r1nPny = Pengaruh tidak langsung secara genotipik dan fenotipik dari sifat ke-1 terhadap Y (hasil)…”
Section: Bahan Dan Metodeunclassified
“…Approximated t-tests were provided by the Calis procedure and were estimated by dividing the path values with the standard error of the path (Hatcher, 1994). There is no reference in the plant breeding and plant genetics literature which tests the path value (Dewey and Lu, 1959;Li 1975;Samonte et al 1998), so our estimates are probably the first. These tests, derived from path analysis used in social sciences and economics (Hatcher, 1994), will be useful to provide the most likely conclusion for interpreting and applying path analysis.…”
Section: Causal Diagrams Path Student's T-test and Sample Sizementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Multicollinearity can cause strange results when attempting to study how well individual predictor variables contribute to an understanding of the dependent variable as the effects of the predictor variables are usually confounded and this may lead to incorrect conclusion of the relationship between independent and dependent variables (Sharma, 1996;Hoe and Kim, 2004). To address this issue, sequential path analysis has been widely used by researchers for determining the relationship between yield and related traits in maize (Agrama, 1996;Mohammadi et al, 2003;Badu-Apraku et al, 2012) and in other crops such as rice (Samonte et al, 1998;2006) and sorghum (Maman et al, 2004;Ezeaku and Mohammed, 2006).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%