2006
DOI: 10.1080/10903120600885209
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Path Analysis Modeling Indicates Free Transport Increases Ambulance Use for Minor Indications

Abstract: Ambulance use increased in 2004 after patient transport fees were abolished. Increased use was associated with decreased age, clinical acuity, and admission need. Abolishing direct patient cost stimulates ambulance use, potentially including inappropriate transport. Path analysis to assess the effect of changed funding on ambulance use could be used to the influence of other locally relevant factors contributing to ambulance use.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

1
20
0

Year Published

2008
2008
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(21 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
1
20
0
Order By: Relevance
“…10 Some years later the introduction of a small universal levy, following abolition of any direct patient fees, realised an increase in usage. 12 Of particular interest, was an increase in use by a younger age group with lower clinical acuity. A survey recently conducted in Japan investigated the effect of introducing user charges on demand.…”
Section: Pricing and Accessibilitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…10 Some years later the introduction of a small universal levy, following abolition of any direct patient fees, realised an increase in usage. 12 Of particular interest, was an increase in use by a younger age group with lower clinical acuity. A survey recently conducted in Japan investigated the effect of introducing user charges on demand.…”
Section: Pricing and Accessibilitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Consequently, developing an effective control system for determining patients who really need transportation is of the utmost urgency. A basic prerequisite for developing such a system is to determine “who” really needs ambulance services, “why” he/she needs such services, and “where” he/she is located [10]. …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Improper use of prehospital EMS leads to wasting limited resources, idling real emergency patients to receive appropriate care, increasing morbidity and mortality rate of patients with conditions that require emergency services, low-quality performance, and job dissatisfaction in prehospital emergency staffs [5]. Therefore, establishing a control mechanism can reduce unnecessary patient transfer and inappropriate use of EMS [9]. …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%