2021 International Conference on Mechanical, Aerospace and Automotive Engineering 2021
DOI: 10.1145/3518781.3519156
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Path Following Control of Underactuated USV Based on Backstepping Control and Disturbance Observer

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(4 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…)) constitutes the nonlinear matrix inequality of Λ 1 , ( 22) is difficult to be solved by LMI. Since SOS method is an important tool to solve nonlinear problems, the SOS conditions is derived from (22) to solve the controller parameters W −1 , R(y cl ), and P(x cl ).…”
Section: Hebrl Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…)) constitutes the nonlinear matrix inequality of Λ 1 , ( 22) is difficult to be solved by LMI. Since SOS method is an important tool to solve nonlinear problems, the SOS conditions is derived from (22) to solve the controller parameters W −1 , R(y cl ), and P(x cl ).…”
Section: Hebrl Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The SOF H$$ {H}_{\infty } $$ control system for heading angle regulation of USV is implemented in MATLAB software, including QEBRL‐SOS method for the solution of the state feedback gain matrix and HEBRL‐SOS method for the solution of the controller parameters. The parameters of the nonlinear system (10) for USV model are, 22 m11=25.8,m22=33.8,m33=2.76,m23=m32=6.2,d11=27,d22=17,d33=0.5,d23=0.2,d32=0.5$$ {m}_{11}=25.8,{m}_{22}=33.8,{m}_{33}=2.76,{m}_{23}={m}_{32}=6.2,{d}_{11}=27,{d}_{22}=17,{d}_{33}=0.5,{d}_{23}=0.2,{d}_{32}=0.5 $$. In order to simulate the real marine environment, time‐varying disturbances are given as τuw=prefix−0.2cosfalse(tfalse)cosfalse(1.5tfalse),τvw=0.01sinfalse(0.1tfalse),τrw=prefix−0.3sinfalse(2tfalse)cosfalse(2.3tfalse)$$ {\tau}_{uw}=-0.2\cos (t)\cos (1.5t),{\tau}_{vw}=0.01\sin (0.1t),{\tau}_{rw}=-0.3\sin (2t)\cos (2.3t) $$ 23 …”
Section: Simulation Experimentsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations