DOI: 10.2969/aspm/04810225
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Path geometries and almost Grassmann structures

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
12
0

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
0
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Regarding these curves as solutions to a system of (n − 1) second order ODEs, one can give an alternative definition of the path geometry as an equivalence class of systems of second order ODEs, where two systems are regarded as equivalent if they can be mapped into each other by a change of dependent and independent variables. In this paper we shall study three-dimensional path geometries encoded into a system of two second order ODEs Y ′′ = F (X, Y, Z, Y ′ , Z ′ ), Z ′′ = G(X, Y, Z, Y ′ , Z ′ ), (1.1) where Y ′ = dY /dX etc, and (F, G) are arbitrary functions on an open set in R 5 which we assume to be of class C 5 . Two such systems are locally equivalent if they are related by a point transformation (X, Y, Z) → (X(X, Y, Z), Y (X, Y, Z), Z(X, Y, Z)).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Regarding these curves as solutions to a system of (n − 1) second order ODEs, one can give an alternative definition of the path geometry as an equivalence class of systems of second order ODEs, where two systems are regarded as equivalent if they can be mapped into each other by a change of dependent and independent variables. In this paper we shall study three-dimensional path geometries encoded into a system of two second order ODEs Y ′′ = F (X, Y, Z, Y ′ , Z ′ ), Z ′′ = G(X, Y, Z, Y ′ , Z ′ ), (1.1) where Y ′ = dY /dX etc, and (F, G) are arbitrary functions on an open set in R 5 which we assume to be of class C 5 . Two such systems are locally equivalent if they are related by a point transformation (X, Y, Z) → (X(X, Y, Z), Y (X, Y, Z), Z(X, Y, Z)).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We may construct T M using a technique described in [10]. We let VM be the manifold of equivalence classes…”
Section: Almost Grassmann Structuresmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The fibre coordinates (u i ) on the new bundle are defined in terms of the fibre coordinates (y i ) of T M by u i = x 0 y i ; the quotient manifold may be thought of as the tensor product of the ordinary tangent bundle with the bundle of scalar densities of weight 1/(n + 1). The construction of the almost Grassmann structure may also be found in [10]. For any spray…”
Section: Almost Grassmann Structuresmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We have discussed a generalization of the construction of the Fefferman metrics from the Grassmanian point of view in [5], so we will not pursue this aspect of the matter any further here. We have discussed a generalization of the construction of the Fefferman metrics from the Grassmanian point of view in [5], so we will not pursue this aspect of the matter any further here.…”
Section: The Flat Casementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Incidentally, there is another way of approaching the definition of Q, which is to observe that 2 R 4 is a 6-dimensional real vector space, which can be identified with V in such a way that N defines the decomposable elements of 2 R 4 , and then Q becomes the Grassmanian of 2-planes in R 4 . We have discussed a generalization of the construction of the Fefferman metrics from the Grassmanian point of view in [5], so we will not pursue this aspect of the matter any further here.…”
Section: The Flat Casementioning
confidence: 99%