2012
DOI: 10.1016/j.atmosenv.2011.09.077
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Path-integrated measurements of carbon dioxide in the urban canopy layer

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
15
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
3

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 25 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
3
15
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Idso et al (2002) also reported a marginal difference in CO 2 concentrations between the urban and sub urban sites during the morning time and high difference during the night time. In addition, several other studies reported the presence of higher CO 2 concentrations at urban sites than at the background or rural sites (George et al, 2007;Idso et al, 2001;Gratani and Varone, 2005;Henninger and Kuttler, 2010;Rice and Bostrom, 2011;García et al, 2012;Chaudhari et al, 2007;Büns and Kuttler, 2012;Briber et al, 2013). Table 2 shows the intensity of CO 2 domes in various cities across the world.…”
Section: Comparison Of Co 2 Concentrations In Different Land Usesmentioning
confidence: 92%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Idso et al (2002) also reported a marginal difference in CO 2 concentrations between the urban and sub urban sites during the morning time and high difference during the night time. In addition, several other studies reported the presence of higher CO 2 concentrations at urban sites than at the background or rural sites (George et al, 2007;Idso et al, 2001;Gratani and Varone, 2005;Henninger and Kuttler, 2010;Rice and Bostrom, 2011;García et al, 2012;Chaudhari et al, 2007;Büns and Kuttler, 2012;Briber et al, 2013). Table 2 shows the intensity of CO 2 domes in various cities across the world.…”
Section: Comparison Of Co 2 Concentrations In Different Land Usesmentioning
confidence: 92%
“…In the developed countries, the dynamics of ambient CO 2 concentrations in urban domains were well documented (Idso et al, 2002;Day et al, 2002;Nasrallah et al, 2003;Gratani and Varone, 2005;Vogt et al, 2006;Briber et al, 2013). It was reported that the CO 2 concentrations in Phoenix, Valladolid, Oregon, Boston, Essen, Rome and Copenhagen cities were higher at the urban centres than at the semi urban and background areas (Idso et al, 2001;Day et al, 2002;Soegaard and Møller-jensen, 2003;Gratani and Varone, 2005;George et al, 2007;Henninger and Kuttler, 2010;Rice and Bostrom, 2011;Büns and Kuttler, 2012;García et al, 2012;Briber et al, 2013). In addition, recent studies revealed that the enhancements of CO 2 concentrations in urban areas (urban CO 2 domes) favour the formation of urban heat islands (UHI) and deteriorate the local air quality by increasing the concentrations of secondary air pollutants and thus affect the public health (Jacobson, 2008(Jacobson, , 2010.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…(right) CO 2 concentration in the chosen rural and urban area is also around 400 ppm (0.04 vol.%). The CO 2 concentration is subject to seasonal fluctuations and depends, for example, on wind speed, volume of traffic, atmospheric stability and CO 2 emission of local industry .…”
Section: Durability Design: Model Input Variablesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…to 0.0465 vol.% over the next 50 years. The CO 2 concentration in suburban and urban area scatters around 400 ppm (0.04 vol.%) and is subjected to seasonal fluctuations and depends, for example, on wind speed, volume of traffic, atmospheric stability and the CO 2 emissions of local industry [24]. Inside buildings (XC1), the CO 2 concentration is usually similar to the outdoor values (XC3, XC4).…”
Section: Determining the Partial Safety Factormentioning
confidence: 99%