Path Loss Characterization for Incoming Signal in Building Corridor

Pinem, Maksum; Sari, Indah Vusvita; Iqbal, Muhammad; Anggriani, Tria; Simorangkir, Andreas Juan Daniel; Panjaitan, Sihar Parlinggoman

doi:10.1109/elticom53303.2021.9590141

Cited by 2 publications

(1 citation statement)

References 2 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…Thirdly, the deterministic models that need complete information on the 3D area map to compute the received signal strength at certain points, like the ray-tracing model. These models are complex in mathematics expression and consider all obstacles that are faced by the propagated signal and the environmental situations [17], [18].…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Performance analysis for a suitable propagation model in outdoor with 2.5 GHz band

et al. 2023

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

As demand for mobile wireless network services continues to rise, network planning and optimization significantly affect development. One of the critical elements in network planning is predicting pathloss. Thus, propagation models predict pathloss in indoor and outdoor environments. Choosing the appropriate propagation model for the area out of existing models is essential for network planning. Selected propagation models suitable with 2.5GHz, such as Friis Free Space Propagation Model (FSPL), Sandford University Interim (SUI), Ericsson, Okumura, and COST-231 HATA models, are utilized for evaluation and compared with empirical data collected from long-term evolution (LTE) networks in urban areas. The best acceptable model is chosen based on statistical results such as mean, standard deviation, and root mean square errors (RMSE). The analytical results show Cost-231 Hata model fits the empirical pathloss with a minimum RMSE of 5.27 dB.

show abstract

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%