2006
DOI: 10.1109/lawp.2006.873950
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Path-Loss Models for Urban Microcells at 5.3 GHz

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
7
0

Year Published

2006
2006
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 22 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
1
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This attenuation is added to the signal attenuation determined by the shadowing propagation model in NS2. We found that the signal attenuation values obtained were comparable to values reported from field experiments at 5.3GHz [38]. The simulation parameters are summarized in Table II. We ran experiments in networks with different node densities: the 350 nodes scenario represents relatively dense networks, 250 nodes scenario for medium density networks and 150 nodes for sparse networks.…”
Section: Simulation Results In Scenario With Obstacles 1) Simulatisupporting
confidence: 79%
“…This attenuation is added to the signal attenuation determined by the shadowing propagation model in NS2. We found that the signal attenuation values obtained were comparable to values reported from field experiments at 5.3GHz [38]. The simulation parameters are summarized in Table II. We ran experiments in networks with different node densities: the 350 nodes scenario represents relatively dense networks, 250 nodes scenario for medium density networks and 150 nodes for sparse networks.…”
Section: Simulation Results In Scenario With Obstacles 1) Simulatisupporting
confidence: 79%
“…10 compares the proposed model with two-ray model and the numerically derived fit from [31], when again the proposed model presents a reasonable compromise. The tworay ground propagation model's behavior is characteristic of the oscillations before the breakpoint [21] (before which there is constructive and destructive interference between the two rays and after which the signal power falls off as r -4 ).…”
Section: B Los Modelingmentioning
confidence: 92%
“…In [31] an empirical model based on measured LOS data for Helsinki streets was given as: Fig. 10 compares the proposed model with two-ray model and the numerically derived fit from [31], when again the proposed model presents a reasonable compromise.…”
Section: B Los Modelingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The received results are spread out in the wide range of path losses values and seem as the certain "swarm" when the sufficient number of experimental measurements are carried out in the microcells [12][13][14][15]. Such "swarm" is also observed at short distances between BS and UE (less than 200 m) when the frequency is high enough (> 20 GHz) [16][17][18].…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%