2020
DOI: 10.3390/s20071927
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Path Loss Prediction Based on Machine Learning Techniques: Principal Component Analysis, Artificial Neural Network, and Gaussian Process

Abstract: Although various linear log-distance path loss models have been developed for wireless sensor networks, advanced models are required to more accurately and flexibly represent the path loss for complex environments. This paper proposes a machine learning framework for modeling path loss using a combination of three key techniques: artificial neural network (ANN)-based multi-dimensional regression, Gaussian process-based variance analysis, and principle component analysis (PCA)-aided feature selection. In genera… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

1
79
0
1

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 116 publications
(81 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
1
79
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The activation function of hidden layer we chose to use in this paper is Rectified Linear Unit (ReLU) [40] as shown in the following formula:…”
Section: Classification Of Reconstructed Xasmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The activation function of hidden layer we chose to use in this paper is Rectified Linear Unit (ReLU) [40] as shown in the following formula:…”
Section: Classification Of Reconstructed Xasmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Common models are the alpha-beta-gamma (ABG) [1] and the close-in free space reference distance with frequency dependent path loss exponent (CIF) model [1]. More recently, non-traditional artificial intelligence techniques such as fuzzy clustering prediction [2,3], artificial neural networks [3][4][5], deep learning [6] and machine learning [5,7] have also been used to estimate the path loss in different environments.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Compared with the ANN-based model established for LOS, the model for NLOS combines the diffraction loss calculated by the traditional PL model with ANN, and the comparative analysis verifies that the hybrid PL model combining ANN and the traditional PL model is more accurate. Reference [29] proposes a machine learning framework for modeling PL using a combination of three key techniques: ANN, Gaussian process, and principle component analysis (PCA) [30]. Compared with traditional PL models, the proposed model is more accurate and flexible, which will be beneficial for the site-specific design of wireless sensor network with high reliability.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%