1985
DOI: 10.2140/pjm.1985.118.249
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Path partitions and packs of acyclic digraphs

Abstract: Let G be an acyclic directed graph with \V(G)\>k. We prove that there exists a colouring { C x , C 2 ,..., C m } such that for every collection {P l9 P 2 ,... ,P k } of k vertex disjoint paths with |UjLi Pj\ a maximum, each colour class C, meets min{|CJ, k} of these paths. An analogous theorem, partially interchanging the roles of paths and colour classes, has been shown by Cameron [4] and Saks [17] and we indicate a third proof. Introduction.. ,ι>/) will be denoted by K(P). The cardinality of P, denoted by |P… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
19
0
1

Year Published

1987
1987
2011
2011

Publication Types

Select...
4
2

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(20 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
0
19
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Conjecture 2.4 holds for k = 1 by the Gallai-Milgram [11] theorem, for k ≥ by the Gallai-Roy Theorem [10,16], and for all acyclic digraphs [2,17,6]. It also holds in the case that P = P ≥k [1].…”
Section: Conjecture 24 (Bergementioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Conjecture 2.4 holds for k = 1 by the Gallai-Milgram [11] theorem, for k ≥ by the Gallai-Roy Theorem [10,16], and for all acyclic digraphs [2,17,6]. It also holds in the case that P = P ≥k [1].…”
Section: Conjecture 24 (Bergementioning
confidence: 99%
“…(For precise statements of all the mentioned theorems, see Section 2.) Berge's conjecture was proved for all acyclic digraphs; see [15,7,17,6,2]. For k = 1, Berge's Conjecture holds by the Gallai-Milgram Theorem [11].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Berge [10] used a different term for orthogonality, defining a k-colouring C k to be strong for a path P if C k meets P in exactly min{|P |, k} different colour classes. We prefer the concept of orthogonality as used in [33,4].…”
Section: Definition 22 (K-norm Of a Path Partition)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Moreover, Conjecture 2.8 was proved for acyclic digraphs in [50,21,4,57]. In fact, a stronger result holds for acyclic digraphs: Theorem 2.9 (Saks [50], Cameron [21], Aharoni et al [4]). Let G be an acyclic digraph, and let k be a positive integer.…”
Section: Definition 22 (K-norm Of a Path Partition)mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation