Path Planning by Unmanned Air Vehicles for Engaging an Integrated Radar Network

Abstract

A growing concept in the field of unmanned air vehicles (UAVs) is the idea of using a team of cooperating vehicles to participate in electronic countermeasures, defined here as jamming or deception techniques. A UAV may be tasked to engage a radar using noise jamming to mask its radar return or that of another vehicle. Similarly, a UAV may be assigned to deceive a radar by directing a delayed signal toward the victim radar, which has the effect of producing a radar phantom perceived by the radar as an object at a false range and/or bearing. Previous work focused on generating a set of waypoints for the UAV to follow in order for the countermeasures to be successful. This paper addresses the path planning required to meet the temporal, spatial, and UAV flight dynamics constraints associated with employing these electronic countermeasures, especially between jamming and deception activities. The UAVs are assigned simplified flight dynamics and performance constraints in two-dimensions, assuming constant altitude flight over a flat-surfaced earth. All tracking radars are given simplified detection properties. A single UAV is provided a pre-determined series of "goal positions." The goal positions may lie along a countermeasure's pre-planned course or they may be established such that the UAV moves from the final waypoint of one countermeasure to the starting point of the next countermeasure. Therefore the UAV must autonomously navigate to a given goal position, subsequently perform a simple, associated task (countermeasure, if required), then navigate to the next goal position in the series. The UAVs will be required to arrive at these waypoints with a specific state, depending on the task at hand. Algorithms for optimal autonomous navigation of this nature were formulated to effectively guide the UAVs to their goal positions to meet the necessary temporal and spatial requirements. Simulations were generated to test the path-planning and control strategies given UAV/radar network scenarios, and overall UAV navigational performance in each simulation was analyzed. This material is declared a work of the U.S. Government and is not subject to copyright protection in the United States. Nomenclature Report Documentation PageForm Public reporting burden for the collection of information is estimated to average 1 hour per response, including the time for reviewing instructions, searching existing data sources, gathering and maintaining the data needed, and completing and reviewing the collection of information. Send comments regarding this burden estimate or any other aspect of this collection of information, including suggestions for reducing this burden, to Washington Headquarters Services, Directorate for Information Operations and Reports, 1215 Jefferson Davis Highway, Suite 1204, Arlington VA 22202-4302. Respondents should be aware that notwithstanding any other provision of law, no person shall be subject to a penalty for failing to comply with a collection of information if it does not display a currently valid OM...

Increasing relative angular velocity for air combat in zero gravity

“…We will be using the idea of turn circles extensively in the following sections. Turn circles have been used in other works such as [14][15][16] in order to calculate various maneuvers in unmanned systems. Definition 2.1 A turn circle is the locus of an aircraft pitching upwards at a constant rate and moving with constant forward speed.…”

Path-Parameterization Approach Using Trajectory Primitives for Three-Dimensional Motion Planning

“…The concept of a Dubins car provides a closed-form solution for optimal trajectories and has been used for many types of planning, such as the traveling-salesman problem (Le Ny and Feron 2005). This foundation is used for several studies into aircraft motion, but the process limits that motion to a 2D plane (Howlett et al 2003;McGee and Hedrick 2007;Tang and Ozguner 2005;Yang and Kapila 2002;Shima et al 2007;Grymin and Crassidis 2009;Sujit and Beard 2007;Zollars et al 2007;Scholer et al 2009;Larson et al 2005;Shanmugavel et al 2005). One approach expands the original 2D formulation into a 3D framework, but it does not deal with constraints in the climb rate or specific values of these climb rates corresponding to trim conditions, as is the case with motion primitives (Shanmugavel et al 2006).…”

Co-Ordinated Rendezvous of Unmanned Air Vehicles to a Formation Using a Sliding Mode Approach

“…Larson et al present an approach for the path planning of UAVs in the scenario of engaging an enemy radar network [9]. The authors develop a geometrybased path planning approach which takes each UAV from its initial position to a desired final position and heading angle, while satisfying various performance constraints.…”