2019 20th Asia-Pacific Network Operations and Management Symposium (APNOMS) 2019
DOI: 10.23919/apnoms.2019.8892916
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Path Selection with Joint Latency and Packet Loss for Edge Computing in SDN

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
3
1

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, it requires statistical history data which may be ineffective in SDN due to memory constraints [9]. Hu et al [15] considered latency and packet loss to design path selection. Delaysensitive flows are routed through a path with minimal delay, other flows are routed via a path with lower packet loss.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…However, it requires statistical history data which may be ineffective in SDN due to memory constraints [9]. Hu et al [15] considered latency and packet loss to design path selection. Delaysensitive flows are routed through a path with minimal delay, other flows are routed via a path with lower packet loss.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Similarly, Alnajim and Salehi [27] presented a QoS-aware path selection algorithm to speed up rerouting of time-sensitive flows for real-time applications, which spare the bottleneck links causing the infeasible scheduling. However, the work in [15,27] did not consider the switch load during the path selection decision. Link latency and the ratio of the link delivery should also be considered to guarantee the quality of the link selected.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations