2020
DOI: 10.1049/iet-cta.2018.5493
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Path tracking control of a self‐driving wheel excavator via an enhanced data‐driven model‐free adaptive control approach

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
16
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 28 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 36 publications
0
16
0
Order By: Relevance
“…e attenuation rate, σ, of the error can be calculated by combining (24) and (25). en, the attenuation rate, σ, of the error is compared with the set threshold value of the attenuation rate, σ.…”
Section: Hp-adaptive Update Algorithmmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…e attenuation rate, σ, of the error can be calculated by combining (24) and (25). en, the attenuation rate, σ, of the error is compared with the set threshold value of the attenuation rate, σ.…”
Section: Hp-adaptive Update Algorithmmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Based on MPC, Regolin et al proposed a linear controller for tracking a given trajectory [24]. Liu et al proposed an adaptive control algorithm for path tracking control by considering time delays [25]. Jing et al designed three different controllers for the reverse motion of a tractor-trailer to solve the tractor-trailer path tracking problem for backwards motion [26].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Among these data‐driven methods, model‐free adaptive control (MFAC) approach has aroused a lot of attention because only the input and output data are used without employing explicit or implicit knowledge of the mathematic model. The MFAC method was first proposed by Hou 7 and has been continuously investigated and extended in these years 8‐11 . As a method to linearize nonlinear nonaffine system during MFAC, dynamic linearization (DL) technique has many advantages, such as data‐driven, just a few arguments are required to be renewed, and the obtained model is equal to the original system without any approximation 12 .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The MFAC method was first proposed by Hou 7 and has been continuously investigated and extended in these years. [8][9][10][11] As a method to linearize nonlinear nonaffine system during MFAC, dynamic linearization (DL) technique has many advantages, such as data-driven, just a few arguments are required to be renewed, and the obtained model is equal to the original system without any approximation. 12 Nevertheless, the data model obtained by the DL technique is proven to be over-linearized because no explicit nonlinear term is contained.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…MFAC schemes are then implemented based on these equivalent virtual data models. In recent years, MFAC algorithms have been extensively applied in many fields, including wide‐area power systems [18], the syngas manufacturing industry [19], water level control systems [18–20], multiagent systems [21, 22], microgrids [23], and autonomous vehicles [24–26].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%