1987
DOI: 10.2190/e8gr-xujh-utdf-c108
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Pathfinder: A Microcomputer Experience in Interpreting Graphs

Abstract: This article describes the design, implementation, and testing of a microcomputer package intended to improve students' understanding and skills in interpreting graphs of physical phenomena. In this package students interpret graphs in order to reproduce the events described by the graphs. Students may also construct events and challenge others to reproduce the events from the graphs they generate. Some previous work is described briefly to provide context for the activities. The package was used with students… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

1
1
0

Year Published

1989
1989
1999
1999

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 4 publications
1
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This verfied the finding of previous researchers such as: Dugdale (1986);Janvier (1978); Mosenthal & Kirsh (1991);Pinker (1981); Preece (1985).…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 89%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This verfied the finding of previous researchers such as: Dugdale (1986);Janvier (1978); Mosenthal & Kirsh (1991);Pinker (1981); Preece (1985).…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 89%
“…Researchers who have studied how learners interpret graphs and tables mention the following processes: reading a graph or table; deciphering the labels on axes and the headings of columns ; describing the global features of the data such as maxima, minima, slope, turning points, regular trends or the means of data presentation such as picture form, bars, columns, lines; relating the properties of the graphs and charts to information described in accompanying text; applying prior knowledge to aid in the comprehension of the information presented (Appel, 1973;Dugdale, 1986;Pinker, 1981;Mosenthal & Kirsh, 1991;Preece, 1985;Roth & Bowen, 1994;Bowen & Roth, 1998;van Reeuwijk, 1992). The first three processes mentioned relate to reading or mental processing of displayed information and the last two points relate to the context in which the information occurs.…”
Section: Interpreting Graphs and Tablesmentioning
confidence: 99%