2008
DOI: 10.1111/j.1751-2824.2008.00156.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Pathogen inactivation: an American view

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2010
2010

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 48 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The reader is also referred to two recent reviews [80,81] and the International Forum [56] which summarize the important questions and debate in this area.…”
Section: Strategies To Prevent Bacterial Contamination Of Blood Compomentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The reader is also referred to two recent reviews [80,81] and the International Forum [56] which summarize the important questions and debate in this area.…”
Section: Strategies To Prevent Bacterial Contamination Of Blood Compomentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Detection methods, including screening of blood components, are the subject of this review. Preventive measures include careful donor selection and predonation health screening, with donor deferral and follow‐up of postdonation information as required [4,5]; optimization of blood collection and manufacturing processes, including improvements in skin cleansing procedures [6–9], choice of collection method and consumables, diversion of initial volume away from the collection bag [10–16], environmental monitoring, and greater availability of the use of apheresis platelets to minimize exposure to donor skin flora [17,18]; developments in pathogen reduction technologies [19–24]; attention to component storage and handling; and promotion of evidence‐based clinical transfusion practice [24,25].…”
Section: Introduction: What Is the Problem?mentioning
confidence: 99%