the secondary distortion, atrophy, or fibrosis. A common anomaly in Chiari types I and II is hypoplasia of the posterior fossa, which is usually not accompanied by histological malformations in the brain. We suggest that the central nervous system anomalies in Chiari anomalies types I and II are not the primary CNS malformation but only an adaptation to the hypoplasia of the posterior fossa and eventually to the additional hypoplasia of the cervical column [4], a theory which is supported by the study of Marín-Padilla and Marín-Padilla [6], who demonstrated hypoplastic basicranium in experimental models of Chiari anomalies types I and II by hypervitaminosis A. Di Rocco and Rende [3] showed a role of glycosaminoglycans in experimental hypoplastic posterior fossa in dysraphism. Roth [8] also found a discrepancy in development between the spinal column and the brain stem (craniocervical growth conflict of both neural and mesodermal tissues).The morphogenesis of both types of anomalies is interpreted rather simply. If the hypoplasia of the posterior fossa is mild, the posterior fossa is entirely preoccupied with the enlarging paleocerebellum, and the later developing neocerebellum will consequently find space remaining only in the foramen magnum (Chiari anomaly type I). If the posterior fossa hypoplasia is advanced, even the earlier developing paleocerebellum must find space in the foramen magnum (Chiari anomaly type II). If the posterior fossa is much more hypoplastic, the later developing cerebellar hemispheres are forced to grow into the remaining space around the brain stem in a lateroanterior direction, resulting in a so-called reverse cerebellum (severe case of Chiari anomaly type II). Furthermore, the deformation (not malformation) of the medulla oblongata (kinky medulla) in Chiari type II anomaly occurs as a result of an extremely shortened lower clivus. Since the cervical column is hypoplastic, the developing cervical cord displays a "descensus" in the fetal period, which is just a reverse situation of the "ascensus" of the lumbosacral cord during normal spinal development in the fetal period. This is the morphogenesis of the ascending course of the cervical roots in Chiari anomaly type II; this phenomenon never occurs as the result of pulling down of the cord due to the occasional complication of lumbar spina bifida, as suggested earlier. (For this reason, I believe surgical spinal cord untethering is not justified for the treatment of Chiari anomaly type II.) Therefore, it becomes clear that the difference between the Chiari anomalies types I and II is only a difference in the severity of hypoplasia of basicranium and additional cervical column hypoplasia during the second trimester of fetal life.