1994
DOI: 10.1016/0378-1135(94)90045-0
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Pathogenesis of Mycobacterium bovis infection in cattle

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

5
99
3
17

Year Published

1998
1998
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
3
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 174 publications
(124 citation statements)
references
References 47 publications
5
99
3
17
Order By: Relevance
“…However, the process by which exposure to infection can lead to a range of disease outcomes is not fully understood (Neill et al, 1994;Pollock et al, 2006). Not all infected cattle display gross lesions, but if present, they are often located in thoracic lymph nodes (Whipple et al, 1996) even in apparently healthy cattle.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, the process by which exposure to infection can lead to a range of disease outcomes is not fully understood (Neill et al, 1994;Pollock et al, 2006). Not all infected cattle display gross lesions, but if present, they are often located in thoracic lymph nodes (Whipple et al, 1996) even in apparently healthy cattle.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In common with other mycobacterial infections, a spectrum of immune responses is known to exist in M. bovis infection in cattle, with cell-mediated immune responses (CMI) predominating in the early stages and antibody developing later in infection [6,7]. For this reason, the tuberculin test and more recently the interferon-g (IFN-g) assay, both measures of CMI, have been employed for the diagnosis of infected animals within eradication programmes [8,9].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In our study, the combination in parallel of CFT and RT ranked higher in sensitivity than did CFT alone. Considering the inverse relationship between cell-mediated and humoral responses to M. bovis (Plackett et al 1989;Neill et al 1994), it might be impossible to develop one serologic test that outperforms a combination of CFT and a serologic test in detecting animals at different stages of infection.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%