2022
DOI: 10.1053/j.seminhematol.2022.02.004
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Pathogenesis of vaccine-induced immune thrombotic thrombocytopenia (VITT)

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
36
0
4

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 37 publications
(40 citation statements)
references
References 63 publications
0
36
0
4
Order By: Relevance
“…The counterargument to this is that adenovirus vector has been utilized in the manufacture of other vaccines such as Ebola and AIDS vaccines, albeit there have been no VITT-like adverse effects reported with either of them [ 8 ]. It may very well be that some other component(s) of the vaccine, such as polysorbate 80 may be the provoking factor in the formation of anti-PF4 antibodies although another source suggests that it is unlikely to play a role in the pathogenesis [ 8 , 10 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The counterargument to this is that adenovirus vector has been utilized in the manufacture of other vaccines such as Ebola and AIDS vaccines, albeit there have been no VITT-like adverse effects reported with either of them [ 8 ]. It may very well be that some other component(s) of the vaccine, such as polysorbate 80 may be the provoking factor in the formation of anti-PF4 antibodies although another source suggests that it is unlikely to play a role in the pathogenesis [ 8 , 10 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In VITT, it has been hypothesized that following microvascular damage during vaccine administration, trace amounts of 50 billion virus particles in each dose come into contact with blood, bringing AdV DNA and polyadenylated hexone proteins the AdV vectors in contact with PF4. Either component of AdV could replace heparin as a scaffold of negative charges leading to the conformational changes of PF4 molecule already described in HIT and to the formation of anti-PF4/polyanion antibodies [39] , [40] , [41] , [42] . These VITT antibodies bind to PF4 epitopes which overlap with the binding site of heparin but differ from those recognized by anti-PF4 antibodies seen in HIT [43] .…”
Section: Potential Mechanisms Of Vaccine-induced Thrombosis and Throm...mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Indeed, the typical time window of 5–20 days between the vaccine administration and the onset of symptoms in VITT, strongly recall the temporary pattern of a secondary, rather than primary, immune response. The inflammatory response associated to vaccine inoculation could provide an important co-signal that stimulates antibody production by preformed B-cells capable of producing anti-PF4 antibodies, as occurs in the pathogenesis of classic HIT [ 42 , 57 , 58 ].…”
Section: The Core Question: Why Me?mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…6 Pathogenic anti-PF4 IgGs subsequently form circulating immune complexes with PF4 tetramers which are thought to drive thrombotic events by Fc gamma receptor IIa (FcγRIIa)dependent platelet activation and to activate granulocytes to release procoagulant neutrophil extracellular traps (NETS). [6][7][8] Serum anti-PF4 antibodies are mostly transient and appear in serum within days of vaccination, suggesting a recall immune response on memory B-cells. 9 Given their causal role in VITT, identification of the molecular composition of the anti-PF4 antibodies and their antigenic target(s) is crucial for developing better diagnostics and treatments and for precise tracking of PF4-specific B-cell clones and secreted clonotypes.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…6 Pathogenic anti-PF4 IgGs subsequently form circulating immune complexes with PF4 tetramers which are thought to drive thrombotic events by Fc gamma receptor IIa (FcγRIIa)-dependent platelet activation and to activate granulocytes to release procoagulant neutrophil extracellular traps (NETS). 6-8 Serum anti-PF4 antibodies are mostly transient and appear in serum within days of vaccination, suggesting a recall immune response on memory B-cells. 9…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%