2021
DOI: 10.3390/microorganisms9020348
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Pathogenic Determinants of the Mycobacterium kansasii Complex: An Unsuspected Role for Distributive Conjugal Transfer

Abstract: The Mycobacterium kansasii species comprises six subtypes that were recently classified into six closely related species; Mycobacterium kansasii (formerly M. kansasii subtype 1), Mycobacterium persicum (subtype 2), Mycobacterium pseudokansasii (subtype 3), Mycobacterium ostraviense (subtype 4), Mycobacterium innocens (subtype 5) and Mycobacterium attenuatum (subtype 6). Together with Mycobacterium gastri, they form the M. kansasii complex. M. kansasii is the most frequent and most pathogenic species of the com… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

1
16
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 80 publications
1
16
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We observed that VF genes belonging to the functional category “virulence, detoxification, adaptation” have undergone a massive reduction in M. kansasii when compared to M. tuberculosis H37Rv, including the significant decrease in the toxin–antitoxin’s subsystem genes previously reported by Wang et al (2015) . Additionally, in accordance with previous observations ( Wang et al, 2015 ; Tagini et al, 2021 ), our analysis showed the presence of all key RD1 genes, including the ESAT-6 and CFP-10, coding for the essential components of the ESX-1 secretion system, and the loci encoding for the ESX-1 secretion-associated proteins, ESP. These genes were conserved in all genomes of the Brazilian M. kansasii isolates, although some of the isolates exhibited heterogeneity in copy number (data not shown) and numerous SNPs in these genes.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 92%
“…We observed that VF genes belonging to the functional category “virulence, detoxification, adaptation” have undergone a massive reduction in M. kansasii when compared to M. tuberculosis H37Rv, including the significant decrease in the toxin–antitoxin’s subsystem genes previously reported by Wang et al (2015) . Additionally, in accordance with previous observations ( Wang et al, 2015 ; Tagini et al, 2021 ), our analysis showed the presence of all key RD1 genes, including the ESAT-6 and CFP-10, coding for the essential components of the ESX-1 secretion system, and the loci encoding for the ESX-1 secretion-associated proteins, ESP. These genes were conserved in all genomes of the Brazilian M. kansasii isolates, although some of the isolates exhibited heterogeneity in copy number (data not shown) and numerous SNPs in these genes.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 92%
“…Their ESAT-6 and CFP-10 nucleotide sequences are almost equal (different only in 3 and 2 base positions, respectively) and result in identical amino acid sequences, although expression level is lower in M. persicum . Furthermore, a recent report concluded that the type-VII secretion system ESX-1-related EspACD locus, which is required for the secretion and function of EsxA (ESAT-6) and EsxB (CFP-10), is absent from M. persicum isolates 32 . Despite this, the effect of increasing the challenge dose of this isolate should be investigated also.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The bias for sequencing clinical specimens likely underestimates mosaicism in mycobacterial genomes, as clinical isolates are often derived from clonal expansions that have had little exposure to other mycobacteria and, thus, the opportunity for HGT. Examples of genomic mosaicism have been observed in the genomes of isolates from the Mycobacterium kansasii complex, M. canettii , and M. abscessus ( 15 , 16 ). For M. canettii , there is more direct evidence for DCT, as not only do natural isolates have mosaic genomes ( 17 ), but strains can also be cocultured to produce recombinants with mosaic genomes ( 18 , 19 ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%