2006
DOI: 10.1303/jjaez.2006.217
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Pathogenicity of Steinernematid Nematodes on the Sweet Potato Weevil, Cylas formicarius (Fabricius) (Coleoptera: Brentidae) and Their Feasibility for Suppression of the Weevil Population

Abstract: Abstract:We evaluated entomopathogenic nematodes (Steinernematidae) as potential biocontrol agents to suppress the wild population of the sweet potato weevil, Cylas formicarius (Fabricius) as part of its eradication program. The pathogenicity of Steinernema carpocapsae ('All' strain), S. feltiae, S. riobrave and S. glaseri ('326', '328', 'Mungyeong' and 'Dongrae' strains) was checked against the sweet potato weevil under laboratory conditions. S. carpocapsae induced the highest mortality in both sexes of the a… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3
1

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Recently there has been an increase in the number of papers published on this form of biological control (San-Blas, 2013), and despite early failures, advances in mass-production and formulation technology, and the discovery of effective isolates/strains, has re-invigorated interest in the use of entomopathogenic nematodes as biological control agents. In a Japanese trial, Steinernema carpocapsae achieved a 90% kill rate on C. formicarius under laboratory conditions and in the field reduced damage by 40-60% (Yamaguchi et al, 2006). In Kenya, trials with S. karii and Heterorhabditis indica, resulted in high mortality of larvae and reduced the adult population (Nderitu et al, 2009).…”
Section: Entomopathogenic Nematodesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Recently there has been an increase in the number of papers published on this form of biological control (San-Blas, 2013), and despite early failures, advances in mass-production and formulation technology, and the discovery of effective isolates/strains, has re-invigorated interest in the use of entomopathogenic nematodes as biological control agents. In a Japanese trial, Steinernema carpocapsae achieved a 90% kill rate on C. formicarius under laboratory conditions and in the field reduced damage by 40-60% (Yamaguchi et al, 2006). In Kenya, trials with S. karii and Heterorhabditis indica, resulted in high mortality of larvae and reduced the adult population (Nderitu et al, 2009).…”
Section: Entomopathogenic Nematodesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Different classes of insect have been identified as predators of Cylas spp [16,22,33], in different geographical regions, but the cost and technical know-how associated with their biological controls remains a challenge in the small scale farming system (Table 3) [110][111][112][113][114][115][116][117][118][119][120][121].…”
Section: Biological Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Heterorhabditis found among different species was indicated to be most effective and pathogenic than Steinernematids [116]. Research on Heterorhabditis indica and S. karii in Kenya resulted in a high death rate of larvae and adults [117]. Steinernema carpocapsae has attained a damage rate of 90% on Cylas formicarius under conditions at the laboratory, but in the field, a decreased of 40%-60% damage on weevils [118].…”
Section: Entomopathogenic Nematodesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…(Hymenoptera: Braconidae), cause more than 30% mortality in immatures of E. postfasciatus [7]. Entomopathogenic nematodes (EPNs) substantially reduce the population of C. formicarius [8] [9] [10]. Both parasitoids and EPNs can parasitize immatures inhabiting inside both root and stem of the plant [10] [11], where effective doses of chemical insecticides are hard to deliver.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Entomopathogenic nematodes (EPNs) substantially reduce the population of C. formicarius [8] [9] [10]. Both parasitoids and EPNs can parasitize immatures inhabiting inside both root and stem of the plant [10] [11], where effective doses of chemical insecticides are hard to deliver. Despite the advantage in the use of these agents, their uses are not common or even not realized yet, primarily due to the costs of both mass production and the application to this low-valued crop.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%