2014
DOI: 10.1200/jco.2014.32.15_suppl.4550
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Pathologic down-staging following standard (SD) MVAC (methotrexate-vinblastine-doxorubicine-cisplatin) or dose-dense MVAC (DD) neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NC) for muscle-invasive urothelial bladder cancer (UC): A retrospective multicenter cohort of the French Genitourinary Tumor Group (GETUG/AFU).

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 0 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Importantly, the dose-dense approach can decrease the time between the start of MVAC chemotherapy and the point of surgery, with a median time of 9.7 weeks reported in the study by Plimack et al 78 (compared with 16–19 weeks for the standard regimens 14,72 ). The results of these two prospective trials 77,78 (TABLE 4), as well as those from two retrospective studies 79,80 , are promising; however, the authors of an editorial 81 , which accompanied the trial publications, identified issues regarding patient selection that might limit the generalizability of the results. For example, both trials included patients with N1 disease, therapy for whom, as previously discussed, cannot truly be considered ‘neoadjuvant’.…”
Section: Improving On Standard Nact With Mvacmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Importantly, the dose-dense approach can decrease the time between the start of MVAC chemotherapy and the point of surgery, with a median time of 9.7 weeks reported in the study by Plimack et al 78 (compared with 16–19 weeks for the standard regimens 14,72 ). The results of these two prospective trials 77,78 (TABLE 4), as well as those from two retrospective studies 79,80 , are promising; however, the authors of an editorial 81 , which accompanied the trial publications, identified issues regarding patient selection that might limit the generalizability of the results. For example, both trials included patients with N1 disease, therapy for whom, as previously discussed, cannot truly be considered ‘neoadjuvant’.…”
Section: Improving On Standard Nact With Mvacmentioning
confidence: 99%