2020
DOI: 10.1101/2020.05.04.077065
|View full text |Cite
Preprint
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Pathologic α-Synuclein Species Activate LRRK2 in Pro-Inflammatory Monocyte and Macrophage Responses

Abstract: Missense mutations in the LRRK2 gene that lead to LRRK2 kinase hyperactivity can cause Parkinson's disease (PD). The link between LRRK2 and -synuclein aggregation in PD remains enigmatic. Numerous reports suggest critical LRRK2 functions in microglial responses. Herein, we find that LRRK2-positive immune cells in the brain represent CD68-positive pro-inflammatory, monocyte-derived macrophages, distinct from microglia. Rod -synuclein fibrils stimulate LRRK2 kinase activity in monocyte-derived macrophages, and… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 90 publications
(121 reference statements)
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We did not detect pronounced differences in LRRK2 protein levels in the two macrophage subsets, which suggests that LRRK2 might execute different functions, dependent on the cell type it is expressed in or that LRRK2 activity can be regulated by extracellular cues. Interestingly, Xu et al reported no apparent differences between M-CSF and GM-CSF differentiated human or mouse macrophages after 48 h of LPS treatment and that IFN-γ up-regulated LRRK2 protein levels in both M-CSF and GM-CSF differentiated macrophages increasing basal levels of Rab10 phosphorylation (15). This indicates that extrinsic factors such as cytokines or pathogen-associated molecular patterns like LPS determine if LRRK2 is activated in response to endomembrane damage.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We did not detect pronounced differences in LRRK2 protein levels in the two macrophage subsets, which suggests that LRRK2 might execute different functions, dependent on the cell type it is expressed in or that LRRK2 activity can be regulated by extracellular cues. Interestingly, Xu et al reported no apparent differences between M-CSF and GM-CSF differentiated human or mouse macrophages after 48 h of LPS treatment and that IFN-γ up-regulated LRRK2 protein levels in both M-CSF and GM-CSF differentiated macrophages increasing basal levels of Rab10 phosphorylation (15). This indicates that extrinsic factors such as cytokines or pathogen-associated molecular patterns like LPS determine if LRRK2 is activated in response to endomembrane damage.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%