2017
DOI: 10.1245/s10434-017-6274-8
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Pathological and Radiological Splenic Vein Involvement are Predictors of Poor Prognosis and Early Liver Metastasis After Surgery in Patients with Pancreatic Adenocarcinoma of the Body and Tail

Abstract: Pathological/radiological SV invasion were independent adverse prognostic factors associated with early liver metastasis in patients with PDAC of the body/tail. Assessment of these findings may be useful in determining optimal therapeutic options in these patients.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
5

Citation Types

2
18
1

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(21 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
2
18
1
Order By: Relevance
“…In line with our finding that radiologic splenic artery encasement/occlusion is a significant prognostic factor, several previous studies have also demonstrated that pathologic splenic artery invasion, but not splenic vein invasion, was a poor prognostic indicator with an associated reduction in overall survival . However, the results on invasion have not been consistent with other studies showing that instead of splenic artery invasion, splenic vein invasion was an independent and significant prognostic factor . Nevertheless, the lack of correlation between the aforementioned factors and splenic vessel involvement suggests that splenic artery encasement may represent something more than just localized tumor extension.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 53%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…In line with our finding that radiologic splenic artery encasement/occlusion is a significant prognostic factor, several previous studies have also demonstrated that pathologic splenic artery invasion, but not splenic vein invasion, was a poor prognostic indicator with an associated reduction in overall survival . However, the results on invasion have not been consistent with other studies showing that instead of splenic artery invasion, splenic vein invasion was an independent and significant prognostic factor . Nevertheless, the lack of correlation between the aforementioned factors and splenic vessel involvement suggests that splenic artery encasement may represent something more than just localized tumor extension.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 53%
“…Previous studies have shown that pathologically confirmed invasion of the splenic artery occurs in 7% to 33% and that of the splenic vein in 31% to 60% of patients undergoing resection for pancreatic adenocarcinoma of the body and tail. [12][13][14][15] These studies also demonstrated that pathologic invasion of the splenic vasculature is a poor prognostic indicator with an associated reduction in overall survival. [12][13][14][15] Similar findings have been reported with pancreatic head cancer where locally advanced disease involving adjacent vasculature is associated with decreased survival.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 87%
See 3 more Smart Citations