2016
DOI: 10.20546/ijcmas.2016.504.013
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Pathological Study of Oral Squamous Cell Carcinoma by Application of P53 and PCNA (Immunohistochemical Approach)

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Gupta et al 48 suggested that the expression pattern of PCNA could be used to determine the extent of neoplastic transformation as well as to assess the histological grades of oral malignancy. Abdulkadir et al 49 reported that PCNA immunoexpression pattern could be used as a prognostic indicator in all the histological grades of oral malignancy. Lončarevićet al 50 correlated the PCNA expression with the degree of peritumoral tissue infiltration.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Gupta et al 48 suggested that the expression pattern of PCNA could be used to determine the extent of neoplastic transformation as well as to assess the histological grades of oral malignancy. Abdulkadir et al 49 reported that PCNA immunoexpression pattern could be used as a prognostic indicator in all the histological grades of oral malignancy. Lončarevićet al 50 correlated the PCNA expression with the degree of peritumoral tissue infiltration.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Abdulkadir et al (2010) from their study suggested that the expression of PCNA was a good indicator of the aggressiveness of the lesion [16]. Madan et al (2015) showed that PCNA was a good marker in differentiating normal epithelium from oral squamous cell carcinoma [9].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…5 The development of cancer is a complex and multi-step process which includes degradation of the basement membrane and extracellular matrix, loss of cell adhesiveness, tumour cell motility and formation of new blood vessels. [6][7] Although PEH shows no cytological evidence of malignancy microscopically, still it can be mistaken for an invasive OSCC. 8 In essence it is significantly important to differentiate between the two pathologies as the therapeutic management is entirely different.…”
Section: Introduction Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%