Since its first clinical use by Carpentier in 1971, 1 the radial artery (RA) has become one of the grafts of choice in coronary surgery. The article by Khot et al 2 claims that the patency of RA grafts is lower than that of internal mammary artery (IMA) as well as venous grafts. We believe that their methodology is flawed, primarily because the sample studied is composed almost exclusively of patients presenting with angina, ECG changes, or both. In most other published reports, only Ϸ20% of patients have recurrent angina at 5 years. Therefore, we believe that the denominator used to calculate the rates of patency is incorrect, and the results obtained by the authors may be misleading. Furthermore, it would appear that the RA was often used in high-occlusion-risk situations, which could account for the low observed patency rate in this highly selected population. For example, 22% of the patients underwent redo surgery, a substantially high proportion of patients in a daily practice, and a situation in which target vessels are often suboptimal. In one third of the cases, the RA was anastomosed to the right coronary artery, which is known to be at high risk for occlusion, whereas the number of right IMA grafts constructed in this area was so small that it did not allow a statistical comparison. Therefore, we believe that it is dangerous to extrapolate the patency data observed in this series to a homogeneous cohort of patients. These results are at variance with previously published series, which established that the patency of the RA graft was 92% and 83% at 1 and 5 years, respectively. These rates are comparable to those of the right IMA graft. Several studies have reported that use of the RA as opposed to vein grafts improved survival and decreased the incidence of cardiac-related events within the first postoperative years. 3,4 In our practice, this graft has been used on a routine basis since 1989. The low morbidity rate associated with RA harvesting led us to use this conduit rather than the right IMA to complement the left IMA-to-left anterior descending artery graft. 5 In conclusion, we believe that the message transmitted by the title of this article relies on a flawed methodology and that its conclusions are contradicted by recently published data.
Christophe Acar, MD
To the Editor:The recent article by Khot et al 1 raises serious concerns about patency when the radial artery is used as a graft in coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG). The results of their retrospective analysis suggest that in patients predominantly presenting with signs and symptoms of myocardial ischemia after CABG, radial artery grafts have lower patency rates than do left internal mammary artery and saphenous vein grafts (SVGs). These sensational results are not only contrary to those of other researchers 2,3 but also contradict the expected benefits of radial artery use.Saphenous veins used as aortocoronary conduits are apt to develop intimal hyperplasia, followed by atheromatous change. This characteristic has been proved hist...