1995
DOI: 10.1002/pros.2990270103
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Pathology review in an early prostate cancer detection program: Results from the american cancer society‐national prostate cancer detection project

Abstract: Biopsy materials obtained in the American Cancer Society National Prostate Cancer Detection Project were reviewed at the Central Pathology Laboratory at the Armed Forces Institute of Pathology. Of 265 cases submitted, 177 were diagnosed as prostatic carcinoma, 7 as prostatic intraepithelial neoplasia (PIN), 13 as atypical glands or atypical hyperplasia, and the remaining 68 were benign hyperplasias. Irrespective of the means of detectin or the grading system used (Gleason or WHO-Mostofi), a large majority of t… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

1996
1996
2012
2012

Publication Types

Select...
6
1
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…At the end of the study, histopathological classification, biochemical determinations, and clinical stage of the samples were revealed and correlated with lipid analyses. For each type of pathological tissue the clinical state of patients and also the criteria for classification of samples (benign or neoplastic) were evaluated following international scores such as those recommended by the American Joint Committee on Cancer Staging, World Health Organization, or Gleason scale [6][7][8]. Presence and localization of metastases were explored by specific medical studies such as magnetic resonance, X-ray computed tomography, and radioisotopic densitography.…”
Section: Patients and Tissue Samplesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…At the end of the study, histopathological classification, biochemical determinations, and clinical stage of the samples were revealed and correlated with lipid analyses. For each type of pathological tissue the clinical state of patients and also the criteria for classification of samples (benign or neoplastic) were evaluated following international scores such as those recommended by the American Joint Committee on Cancer Staging, World Health Organization, or Gleason scale [6][7][8]. Presence and localization of metastases were explored by specific medical studies such as magnetic resonance, X-ray computed tomography, and radioisotopic densitography.…”
Section: Patients and Tissue Samplesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…According to our treatment selection categories, the patients in this study were characterized by low stage, low or intermediate grade disease, and favorable pretreatment PSA values. These criteria exemplify the improvement in prognostic parameters observed when otherwise healthy American men older than 50 years are screened for prostate carcinoma with PSA, digital rectal examination, and transrectal ultrasound 32‐34…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Cancer detection rates across the five annual examinations averaged 2.0%, with a high of 2.7% yielded by the first examination. Earlier reports from the ACS‐NPCDP and other studies have provided detailed assessments of the comparative sensitivity, specificity, and predictive value of PSA level, transrectal ultrasound, and digital rectal examination in the early detection of prostate cancer, and those results are not included in this report 4,5,11–13 …”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The principal study outcome was the diagnosis of prostate cancer. Slides for all patients diagnosed with cancer were reviewed by the ACS‐NPCDP review pathologist at the Armed Forces Institute of Pathology 5 . Classification of clinical stage was based originally on the Whit‐more paradigm, but for the purpose of comparison with data from the NCDB, cancers were assigned to American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC) pathologic stages I through IV 6,7 …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%