2017
DOI: 10.1136/jmedgenet-2017-104584
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Pathology update to the Manchester Scoring System based on testing in over 4000 families

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

5
58
0
2

Year Published

2017
2017
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 57 publications
(65 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
5
58
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…In our study, across the North West of England, selection criterion for germline BRCA1/2 testing was mostly based on an individual’s pathology adjusted Manchester Score of ≥15 points, with 17% (94/557) falling below the 15-point threshold 30. This scoring system provides an alternative method for determining whether an individual’s combined BRCA1 and BRCA2 carrier probability is ≥10% (table 1).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…In our study, across the North West of England, selection criterion for germline BRCA1/2 testing was mostly based on an individual’s pathology adjusted Manchester Score of ≥15 points, with 17% (94/557) falling below the 15-point threshold 30. This scoring system provides an alternative method for determining whether an individual’s combined BRCA1 and BRCA2 carrier probability is ≥10% (table 1).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…30 The development of the Manchester Scoring System was based on empirical data gathered from the Manchester mutation-screening programme 31. Each individual, from one side of the family, is scored for each gene separately, BRCA1 and BRCA2 (table 1).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The recent iteration in 2017 (MSS3), involved four major updates. The changes included adding scores for adopted patients (ie, family history unknown), increasing the downward adjustment for HER2 receptor status and increasing the weightage for TNBC and high-grade serous ovarian cancer (HGSOC) 13. These updates addressed patients with HGSOC, reporting 17.1% incidence of BRCA1/2 mutations 14.…”
Section: Introduction and Aimsmentioning
confidence: 99%